AI Rate Professor

English

Jacqui Cain

ENGL1A · ENG1B · ENGL350E6 · ENGLISH1A · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Choose Jacqui Cain only if you want a demanding writing class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict writing standardsHarsh grading concernsMixed teaching clarityRewrite policyHigh workload spikes
  • Student opinion is and very poor clarification.
  • Several reviews warn that grading and writing expectations can feel harsh.
  • A generous rewrite policy helps students who show up, participate, and keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but , and the need to show up, participate, and stay current.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The writing content is challenging because students report , and demanding English work.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person English courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Comments emphasize showing up and even mention strict restroom limits, so .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they suggest strict classroom expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recommendation is low because strong praise is outweighed , and stressful workload.

All and is highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

as harsh, though the rewrite policy gives motivated students a path to improve.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is described as and five essays in three weeks.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

Teaching quality is polarized, with some students praising her passion while and unhelpful.

Format shift

, and they conflict strongly.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears writing- and .

Format shift

All assessment evidence comes from in-person writing-course reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

passionate supporters, harsh critics, strict expectations, and a helpful rewrite policy.

Main concern

and close guidance may struggle with her expectations and grading.

What students said

“She has a .”
ENG1B
“ . Run away.”
ENGL1A
“Grades too harshly so if you want a good gpa.”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and assignments, and do not clearly prove a specific exam format or proctoring policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book status, proctoring, midterm format, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Show up for class, participate, and stay up with the assignments, and you'll do fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

40/100

“Absolutely horrible at clarifying.”

📈 Grade Difficulty

32/100

“Grades too harshly so if you want a good gpa.”

⚖️ Rewrite Policy

28/100

“She has a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is very passionate about her subject and it rubs off on you.
  • She doesn't help her students in making sure they on the right track even of you let her know you don't not understand the curriculum.
  • Jacqui is amazing. She is a little bit strict because she knows that students need to learn accountability.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload & Grades

  • The class was challenging, no doubt, but this is a writing class, so I already expected a tough work load (which wasn't actually that big).
  • She has a .
  • Overly critical, 5 essays in 3 weeks.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Seven in-person reviews across several years provide meaningful evidence, but opinions are sharply split.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1B4 reviews
ENGL1A1 review
ENGL350E61 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1