AI Rate Professor

History

Toby Green

POLSC10 · POLISCI10 · HIST · NAS1 · POLIS10 · ANTH3 · PSCI10 · POLS10 · HIST9 · POL1 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take him if you want an engaging social science instructor and , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturerHeavy Reading and WritingSupportive When AskedSlow GradingStrong Subject Knowledge
  • Students often praise his knowledge, humor, and ability to make history and political science engaging.
  • The main drawback is a and writing load with .
  • Online-related experiences are mixed, with some students learning a lot and and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A seems reachable if students do the reading and writing, but the workload and .

Online evidence is more mixed and workload-heavy, while as fair if completed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The material is understandable and engaging, but frequent reading, writing, and .

Both formats mention significant work, with online comments adding course-organization problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but students mention flexibility when communicating with him.

The clearest flexibility evidence comes from in-person-labeled reviews, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

Most students recommend him for engaging teaching and knowledge, but , and workload lower the recommendation.

, while online evidence is sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Students describe him as fair and reasonable, but and .

Format shift

Online comments include the strongest grading complaints, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention a serious amount of reading, writing, and long papers.

Format shift

Both formats point to heavy workload, with online comments emphasizing writing load and and papers.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most students describe him as knowledgeable, engaging, supportive, and able to make social science interesting.

Format shift

In-person evidence is strongly positive, while online evidence is mixed because course setup and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments , and papers rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly describe assignment-based work, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-labeled reviews mostly praise his teaching, humor, knowledge, and flexibility, though several describe online-course issues inside those comments.

Main concern

The workload and long papers.

What students said

“A lot of reading and writing in the class but he's flexible as long as you communicate with him.”
POLS10
“work load in his classes is high, but he's an interesting guy, really funny and class is engaging.”
POLSC10

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are split between strong teaching and serious concerns about workload, recycled materials, and .

Main concern

Heavy writing and .

What students said

“ and recycles last semesters material so dates are always messed up.”
POLISCI10
“You learn a lot. , and supportive.”
HIST

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far one of the !”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“He know his material and is a wonderful teacher.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“there's a serious load of work and writing so be ready.”

👍 Recommendation Value

74/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he made all of them (even history) very interesting.
  • Toby's US History course was the first time I ever enjoyed US History.
  • Great teacher, helpful and knowledgable

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Grades

  • A lot of reading and writing in the class but he's flexible as long as you communicate with him.
  • Expect to work, but don't worry, it is never overkill.
  • he likes to assign 10 page papers

Theme 3

⏱️ and Online Setup

  • instructor response to questions always slow
  • online the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 reviews provide consistent themes over several years, but many are old and some format labels conflict with the comment content.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

POLSC103 reviews
ANTH31 review
HIST1 review
HIST91 review
NAS11 review
Show 5 more courses
POL11 review
POLIS101 review
POLISCI101 review
POLS101 review
PSCI101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values