AI Rate Professor

Business

Martha Racine-Taylor

CIS16BUS10 · BUS10 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

, but do not expect strong teaching or .

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easy classesLow instructionRandom grading concernsGood grade potential
  • Students consistently describe the classes as very easy.
  • Teaching quality is weak, with complaints about little instruction and .
  • The grade more than deep learning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The course is repeatedly called incredibly easy, but effortless A.

Online and in-person-counted reviews both describe easy work, but .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students describe the material and assignments as simple, even when they criticize the instruction.

Both formats support easy content, with the online review saying Business was more complex but still simple.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews , so flexibility cannot be proven.

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

She may work for students who just want an easy grade, but weak teaching and .

Online evidence is negative about help, while and waste of time.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

The course sounds easy, but one review reports random grades and .

Format shift

Online evidence suggests easy grading potential, while .

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

Students repeatedly describe the classes and assignments as incredibly easy or simple.

Format shift

Both online and .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching is criticized as unhelpful, assignment-driven, and lacking real instruction.

Format shift

Online evidence is unhelpful, while and not teaching.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Reviews describe book assignments and .

Format shift

Both formats point to assignment-based assessment rather than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person-counted reviews are mixed, with one praising helpfulness and one calling the class a waste of time with random grades.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent teaching and .

What students said

“This teacher was easy and very helpful.”
BUS10
“The teacher didn't teach, just gave random assignments and random grades - .”
BUS10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review says both classes were easy but had little instruction and limited help.

Main concern

The main concern is minimal teaching support.

What students said

“Both were incredibly easy but .”
CIS16BUS10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy or exam format.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

The online review does .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you just want a good grade and are not interested in learning much, she is for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in easiness, teaching support, and . Credibility rating: Low.

📈 Easy Grade Potential

82/100

“Both were incredibly easy but .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“The teacher didn't teach, just gave random assignments and random grades - .”

📝 Workload Lightness

90/100

“The Bus class was more complex but still simple.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Both were incredibly easy but .
  • This teacher was easy and very helpful.
  • If you just want a good grade and are not interested in learning much, she is for you.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The CIS class was just assignments out of the book with little or no instruction.
  • The teacher didn't teach, just gave random assignments and random grades - .
  • The and interesting.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict on helpfulness while giving limited assessment detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUS102 reviews
CIS16BUS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values