AI Rate Professor

English

Elizabeth Yee

EGNL1A · ENG1A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Take Elizabeth Yee only if you want a demanding writing course and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRigorous writing teacherHarsh but fair graderHelpful when askedHeavy homeworkMixed organization
  • Students consistently describe the course as rigorous and demanding.
  • Several students say she improves writing and .
  • Negative , and confusing or opinionated teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A appears to require consistent writing effort, keeping up with homework, and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course content is writing-intensive and repeatedly described as rigorous and demanding.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but the and need to keep up suggest limited flexibility.

, and they do not directly describe attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

but warn that the class can feel harsh, heavy, and frustrating.

The recommendation and is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly say she grades hard or harshly, though one positive review calls it fair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews mention homework almost every class day, long writing assignments, and tons of homework.

Format shift

The workload evidence is entirely in-person, with no online workload data.

Teaching experience

Average

63/100

Positive reviews praise her help and writing instruction, while and disorganized.

Format shift

All and is mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

Comments , and course materials rather than exams.

Format shift

, and they emphasize writing assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

strong learning for prepared students but real frustration for others.

Main concern

The and heavy writing workload.

What students said

“The professional and technical writing theme is rigorous and demanding”
EGNL1A
“Grades hard, but fair.”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more in one semester under Libby than I had previously thought humanly possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

63/100

“She is one of the .”

⚖️

25/100

“Grades hard, but fair.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is one of the .
  • Teacher disorganized, confusing, she would rather teach ethics than english.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Grades hard, but fair.
  • She tends to grade rather harshly and you really need to keep up with the material to be successful.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • .
  • Tons of homework.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Six older reviews give consistent workload and but mixed teaching opinions and limited policy detail.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A5 reviews
EGNL1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values