AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Garrett Kenehan

MATH15 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if available, but weigh the strong praise against the very small review sample.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate TeacherEffective LecturerFairMemorableGood Humor
  • Students describe him as highly passionate about both math and teaching.
  • The only review reports fair treatment and low difficulty.
  • Evidence is very positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The low difficulty and fair tone suggest an A is very manageable, but there is no direct grade evidence.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The course sounds approachable because the professor is effective and the reported difficulty is low.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Recommended because the student strongly praises his passion, fairness, humor, and lasting impact.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

The review explicitly calls him very fair but .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

78/100

The reported difficulty is low, and the comment contains no workload complaints.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

The student describes him as passionate, effective, fair, humorous, humble, and memorable.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not identify whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The , and teaching effectiveness.

Main concern

The evidence is based on only one old review.

What students said

“Awesome professor.”
MATH15
“Very fair, good sense of humor and humility.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or exam requirements.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ the utmost importance to him.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and fairness. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ the utmost importance to him.”

👍 Recommendation Level

92/100

“Definitely an instructor I will remember.”

⚖️ Fairness

72/100

“Very fair, good sense of humor and humility.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Awesome professor.
  • He has a passion for the subject and for teaching it to others.
  • the utmost importance to him.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Very fair, good sense of humor and humility.
  • Definitely an instructor I will remember.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review, despite its detailed and consistent praise.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values