AI Rate Professor

English

Hubert Leggett

ENGL150 · ENG1A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and limited guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsSparse evidenceMixed ratingsModerate difficulty
  • One substantive review says expectations were hard to understand.
  • The other review has no usable comment despite a high rating.
  • Evidence is too thin and old for a confident judgment.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Getting an A may require guesswork because one review .

Only in-person evidence is available, and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course difficulty appears moderate, but .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation is uncertain because the only meaningful comment is negative and the .

, and it is too thin for a strong recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

because a student could not tell what he wanted.

Format shift

, and it mainly suggests unclear expectations.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not give clear workload details, so as moderate.

Format shift

comments.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching experience is weak because the only substantive comment says expectations were hard to understand.

Format shift

, and it is sparse but concerning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

As an English course with , but reviews do not give specifics.

Format shift

, and assessment details are not clearly stated.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is mixed but mostly uninformative, with .

Main concern

Students may struggle to know .

What students said

“Hard to tell what he wanted from us.”
ENG1A
“No Comments”
ENGL150

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hard to tell what he wanted from us.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting limited themes in clarity and evidence quality; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Hard to tell what he wanted from us.”

⚖️

38/100

“Hard to tell what he wanted from us.”

📉 Evidence Quality

25/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to tell what he wanted from us.
  • No Comments

Theme 2

⚖️ About Expectations

  • Hard to tell what he wanted from us.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two old reviews and only one contains meaningful detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A1 review
ENGL1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values