AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Mike Cox

RUNN10 · PE12 · PE12A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a and expects real participation.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat CoachBeginner FriendlyHelpful InstructorPersonableHighly Recommended
  • Students consistently describe Mike Cox as helpful, personable, and .
  • He is especially strong for beginners who need hands-on guidance.
  • The class is not effortless because he expects students to actually work out.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

The course sounds fair and supportive, but students still need to work out and participate.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The content is beginner-friendly because he takes time to show equipment and answer questions.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and effective with beginners.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

, so but the low difficulty suggests a fair experience.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and it does not discuss grades.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is physical , but he expects students to work out.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students consistently describe him as helpful, personable, and a great teacher.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

Reviews mention participation and skill guidance, with no exams described.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and none mention exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing hands-on help, kindness, and a productive workout environment.

Main concern

Students must be ready to participate instead of coasting.

What students said

“Great coach!”
PE12
“He's a great PE teacher, though he does expect you to work out and not play around.”
PE12A
“Mike Cox is a fabulous teacher and i'd let him teach me again any time!”
RUNN10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great coach! I took him for Beginning Weights and he took the time to show me how to use the equipment and spent considerable time also showing me how to use the free weights (and I had tons of questions, having never lifted before).”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and participation. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“Very personable, and a great class overall.”

👍 Recommendation Level

96/100

“ !”

💪 Participation Expectation

62/100

“He's a great PE teacher, though he does expect you to work out and not play around.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great coach!
  • and nice.
  • Mike Cox is a fabulous teacher and i'd let him teach me again any time!

Theme 2

🏋️ About Class Experience

  • he took the time to show me how to use the equipment
  • spent considerable time also showing me how to use the free weights
  • he does expect you to work out and not play around

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three consistent but older reviews give a detail.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PE121 review
PE12A1 review
RUNN101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values