AI Rate Professor

English

Kathryne Steele

ENG151 · ENG1A · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

She is a strong choice for students who can follow detailed writing instructions and keep up with regular assignments.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear instructionsGreat feedbackFair gradingWriting heavyExtra credit
  • Most students describe her as , and .
  • The class has steady writing, discussions, and reading, but most students say it is manageable if directions are followed.
  • One recent online review raises a serious concern about strict content boundaries around political topics.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Students usually report A-level outcomes when they follow directions, participate, and complete steady but manageable writing work.

Online evidence strongly supports an achievable A, while but too limited to add much detail.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The work is writing-heavy but not intellectually difficult when students read instructions carefully and keep pace.

Online reviews describe regular assignments and , while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

Reviews emphasize participation and , so flexibility is not clearly proven.

Online reviews focus on weekly participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend her because , and extra credit opportunities.

Online reviews provide most of the recommendation evidence, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Multiple students call grading fair and mention , though one review reports a strict zero for content rules.

Format shift

and supportive but includes one strict policy complaint, while as very fair.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

There are frequent discussions, essays, readings, and writing assignments, but most students say the work is not hard.

Format shift

Online reviews give clear workload details, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently , and supportive tone despite one negative online experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is well documented and mostly excellent, while but sparse.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessment , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly describe writing assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

but positive, with one and understanding.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“All of her work is graded very fairly, and .”
ENG1A
“Great teacher. Fun class.”
ENG151

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly excellent, citing clear , and manageable writing tasks.

Main concern

There is frequent writing and one student reported strict limits on potentially political content.

What students said

“There is always some sort of , but it is not hard.”
ENG1A
“ and overall provided a wonderful online learning environment.”
ENG1A
“Disallows anything that could be seen as hypothetically even slightly political by anyone.”
ENG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam rules, proctoring, , and the course appears assignment-based.

No Clear Exam EvidenceAssignment-Based Course

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, midterms, finals, open-book rules, or proctoring rules.

Online

Online reviews describe essays, discussions, readings, and assignments but .

DiscussionsEssaysWriting Assignments
“The online class consisted of 1 discussion topic a week 250 words and 4 100 word responses.”
ENG1A
“There were about 6 essays we had to complete with simple prompts.”
ENG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class just participate and show some effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Professor Steele provided .”

✍️ Assignment Load

58/100

“There is always some sort of , but it is not hard.”

⚖️

82/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Steele is a super sweet professor and she genuinely wants her students to succeed.
  • This was a great English class, Professor Steele provided .
  • and really helps the learning process.

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • There are a lot of discussions and .
  • There is always some sort of , but it is not hard.
  • .

Theme 3

⚖️

  • All of her work is graded very fairly, and .
  • Lots of opportunities.
  • She does have very specific instructions for paper formats, but just read the instructions well and you will be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews give useful but limited evidence, with most details coming from online ENG1A reviews and only two in-person comments.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG1512 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 4 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1