AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Katryn Weston

STATS1 · MATH2 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are willing to attend and practice.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringHelpful feedbackBeginner friendlyExtra creditAttendance matters
  • Students and willingness to help.
  • Grades are very attainable because she gives extra help, , dropped work, corrections, and fair expectations.
  • Attendance and active practice matter, especially for students who struggle with math.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very realistic if students attend, do homework, and , and .

, but online evidence specifically mentions and manageable workload.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

She makes math and and support, though struggling students may still need steady attendance.

In-person reviews emphasize board work and classroom practice, while and encouragement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally strict, but several reviews say going to and passing.

, while online reviews mention support-class participation and help.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students recommend her because , and makes difficult math feel manageable.

Both online and from in-person classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Reviews and homework, , final curves, and many chances to succeed.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions , while in-person evidence gives stronger detail on drops, curves, and .

Workload

Light

78/100

Work is described as manageable, with and practice than overwhelming volume.

Format shift

Online reviews directly call workload manageable, while and class practice.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students consistently describe her as , and deeply supportive.

Format shift

Both formats praise her support, with and hands-on practice.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, quizzes, tests, finals, , and participation-based practice rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention and workload, while in-person , and a final curve.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, with repeated praise for , and a comfortable classroom.

Main concern

Some students may want less community time and more direct math instruction.

What students said

“She prepares you fully for the exams”
MATH2
“She is a great teacher and you can tell that she really cares about her students and wants them to succeed.”
STATS1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students describe her as , and supportive during difficult remote terms.

Main concern

Attendance and support-class participation still matter for success.

What students said

“Katryn made all of my fears go away!”
STATS1
“The workload was very manageable.”
MATH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is student-friendly overall because , and strong preparation, but .

Exam CorrectionsFinal CurveLowest Test ReplacementOne Page of NotesPreparation For Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, lowest-test replacement, and one page of notes, but do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules.

Final CurveLowest Test ReplacementOne Page of NotesPrepares You For Exams
“She prepares you fully for the exams”
MATH2
“Allows a page of .”
MATH2

Online

Online reviews mention but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Exam Corrections
“She allowed for ”
MATH2

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Katryn is AMAZING. Loved taking stats with her! It was the very first math class that I did not fail, thanks to her!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“She was able to help all students understand what we were doing.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ !”

⚖️

92/100

“ , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes it easy and fun to learn!!
  • She prepares you fully for the exams
  • She was able to help all students understand what we were doing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The workload was very manageable.
  • She allowed for
  • She gives too many chances and does not challenge her students when they really need it.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is awesome and cares!
  • She makes so much time for her students.
  • She wants all her students to succeed and offers so much help.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across several years are detailed, recent, and highly consistent, with .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

STATS17 reviews
MATH26 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1