AI Rate Professor

Guidance

Derrick Wydick

GUID1 · GUIDE1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
83/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

and are willing to participate, but be aware that a few students had sharply negative experiences.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringEasy AParticipation MattersGood AdviceMixed Professionalism
  • .
  • Most students describe him as helpful, caring, and easy to talk to.
  • A minority report very negative interactions and pointless assignments, so experience depends on fit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Students repeatedly report A-range grades and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The guidance course appears low in academic difficulty, though participation and assignments still matter.

All course-easiness evidence comes from in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Comments suggest participation is important and skipping can hurt success, but .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, though several severe negative reviews reduce confidence.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the majority are positive despite some strong negative outliers.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades trend high, and students say and participating can lead to an A.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The course seems easy overall, but multiple reviews mention lots of .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students describe him as caring, helpful, and conversational, but a few reviews describe poor treatment or low value.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and conversations more than exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, with students praising his support, advice, and conversational style.

Main concern

Some students describe the as frustrating and unhelpful.

What students said

“ .”
GUID1
“Genuinely the .”
GUIDE1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an final structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Participate and do the homework and you'll get an A.”
GUIDE1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and wants nothing but his students to pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, participation, workload, and fit. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

76/100

“He's super easy to talk to, I feel like listens without judgement, and doesn't rush me.”

📈 Easy A Path

86/100

“Participate and do the homework and you'll get an A.”

⚠️ Mixed Fit

72/100

“Easy enough class if you don't mind doing lots of professor feel good.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • He constantly reminds .
  • He definitely helped with explaining picking my classes.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Hes a good teacher, just participate
  • Participate and do the homework and you'll get an A.
  • Easy enough class if you don't mind doing lots of .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Negative Experiences

  • He is a very mean person.
  • No help. Dropped.
  • Genuinely the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews across several years provide enough detail, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

GUIDE16 reviews
GUID13 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1