AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kath Christensen

CCCTDM50 · CART53 · CCTDM50 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you , but her in-person classes have strong historical praise.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderOnline ProblemsGreat In PersonSlow RepliesCreative Fit Issues
  • Online reviews are strongly negative and , and rigid quiz answers.
  • In-person reviews are strongly positive and , and inspiration.
  • The overall recommendation is format-dependent, with online CART53 carrying the biggest risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Online students say A-level work is hard because quizzes and seem simple.

Online evidence is strongly harsh, while but still emphasize effort and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content is not always described as conceptually hard, but , and strict interpretation make it demanding.

Online reviews describe repetitive but frustrating work, while but valuable learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

important rather than proving a strict mandatory policy.

Online attendance evidence is absent, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Online students mostly warn against taking her, while .

Online reviews are mostly negative, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Online students repeatedly say quizzes and tests are graded very hard and sometimes require exact wording from the book.

Format shift

Online grading evidence is harsh, while problem.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Online reviews mention lots of , and slow grading.

Format shift

Online reviews show heavier workload complaints, while and effort.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

In-person teaching is praised highly, but recent online reviews , and poor feedback practices.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is poor, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

56/100

Reviews mention quizzes, important tests, , and class effort.

Format shift

Online evidence includes quizzes, tests, discussions, and projects, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students praise her as , and .

Main concern

Attendance and effort matter, and the class is not described as effortless.

What students said

“She is one of the .”
CART53
“ .”
CCTDM50

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe harsh , and little openness to interpretation.

Main concern

as rigid, rough, and dependent on exact textbook wording.

What students said

“ .”
CART53
“she grades ”
CART53

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online reviews support strict quiz and , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Strict QuizzesImportant TestsTextbook Wording Required

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Tough TestsReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ ”
CCTDM50

Online

Online reviews mention strict quizzes and important tests, but do not .

Strict QuizzesImportant TestsTextbook Wording Required
“She if the answer wasn't word for word from the book.”
CART53
“Will mark correct and find”
CART53

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Art shouldn't be this difficult to get an A in.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

18/100

“she grades ”

👨‍🏫 Format Split

55/100

“Kath has been such a great Professor!”

👍 Recommendation Risk

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • Kath is an absentee instructor.
  • She takes super long to reply to emails and .
  • and redundant.

Theme 2

⚖️ About Grades

  • She if the answer wasn't word for word from the book.
  • Overall she grades very rough and you need to get the textbook.
  • Art shouldn't be this difficult to get an A in.

Theme 3

🏫

  • She is one of the .
  • and puts a huge amount of time in preparing for her classes.
  • Loved all of Kath's classes. Excellent teacher!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across online and split between recent online criticism and older in-person praise.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CART538 reviews
CCCTDM502 reviews
CCTDM501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2