AI Rate Professor

Emergency Medical Services

Silvia Watterson

EMS0 · EMS4 · CEMS40808 · EMT · OFTEC50 · EMT0808 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless , and have no practical alternative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderTest heavyLecture heavyUnclear expectationsLow recommendation
  • Most students describe the course as harsh, test-heavy, and poorly aligned with lectures or readings.
  • Many comments say lectures do not help and that .
  • In-person reviews are especially severe, while online reviews , and little hands-on practice.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and low pass rates.

Online reviews mention unclear tests and busy work, while , and certification risk.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The content and structure feel difficult because students must self-teach, read heavily, and prepare for .

Both formats are difficult, but and includes repeated complaints about certification and class failure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

and that missing class can prevent passing or certification.

, while online reviews do not add clear flexibility evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

6/100

Nearly all students warn against taking her because they describe poor teaching, harsh testing, and little useful support.

Both formats are negative, with in-person reviews showing the strongest and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Students repeatedly call her a and , and grades based on few high-stakes items.

Format shift

, while online reviews also mention tests that do not follow reading well.

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

The workload is heavy because students report lots of , and high-stakes test preparation.

Format shift

Online reviews mention busy work and reading, while and intense test pressure.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Most reviews say lectures are useless, support , and students must learn from the book.

Format shift

Both formats are poor, with in-person reviews giving broader and more severe evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Students repeatedly describe the class as test-heavy, graded by few things, and driven by quizzes or tests.

Format shift

and quizzes, while online reviews also say tests do not follow reading well.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing useless lectures, , and low pass rates.

Main concern

Students say lectures do not prepare them for tests and missing class can be disastrous.

What students said

“No need to take notes they won't . just read the book.”
EMS0
“If you miss one class you won't get your cert.”
EMS0
“If you do not read the book you will not pass.”
EMT0808

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe lecture-heavy delivery, unclear expectations, lots of , and and readings.

Main concern

Students report minimal hands-on learning and .

What students said

“All you do is listen to her talk, barely any hands on experience which is essential.”
CEMS40808
“Lots of reading and busy work online. . Tests do not follow reading well.”
OFTEC50

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exam risk is high because students describe test-heavy grading, poor alignment, limited access to quizzes, and harsh outcomes, but .

Test HeavyGraded By Few ThingsShort Test TimeTests Do Not Follow ReadingPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe strict and high-stakes tests, but they do not .

Test HeavyShort Test TimeNo Quiz AccessHigh Failure Risk
“She gave us 10 minutes to take a .”
EMS4
“you dont have any access to your quizzes which is what the .”
CEMS40808
“over 3/4 of my class failed the .”
EMT0808

Online

Online reviews mention tests and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Tests Do Not Follow ReadingPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“ .”
OFTEC50

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If so!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“The lectures are useless so just read the book.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

6/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“Tells you things will not be on the test and that is what the test is comprised of, over 3/4 of my class failed the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • No need to take notes they won't . just read the book.
  • Does a poor job of teaching, and becomes angry if you question her.
  • She was very knowlegable and explained everything well.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Most don't pass.
  • If you do not read the book you will not pass.
  • Something like a 20% pass rate, a 7 unit class, and there are no other Professors to teach this course.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Risk

  • If you miss one class you won't get your cert.
  • and she dropped me from the class.
  • All you do is listen to her talk, barely any hands on experience which is essential.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews over many years are detailed and consistently negative, with repeated themes across formats.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CEMS408085 reviews
EMS03 reviews
EMS41 review
EMT1 review
EMT08081 review
Show 1 more courses
OFTEC501 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1