AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Kathy Schultz

SPCOM9 · CMPSC13 · CCCTDM10 · CCTIS10 · CMPSC01 · CCTIS138 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want a manageable class and can tolerate slow lectures, but if you need current, engaging instruction.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy UnitsLecture HeavyHelpful With QuestionsOutdated MaterialFew Graded Items
  • Students often say the material is easy or passable if they do the work and participate.
  • Teaching quality is and boring.
  • Grades may depend on a small number of , so mistakes can carry weight.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students say the class is easy if you show up, participate, and , though a few graded items can make outcomes uneven.

Online evidence warns not to fall behind, while as easy units or .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Most comments describe the subject matter as not difficult, with difficulty coming more from lecture style or workload than concepts.

The online review sounds faster paced, while easy or basic.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

40/100

Participation and showing up are repeatedly tied to passing, but reviews do not prove a .

, while the online review emphasizes staying current with work.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and help with questions, but criticize boring lectures, outdated material, and .

The only online review recommends her strongly, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Grades often sound attainable through participation and labs, though some students report .

Format shift

Online grading criteria are described positively, while .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is usually manageable but can include lots of , and few high-impact graded items.

Format shift

Online workload risk comes from falling behind, while to lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

She can be helpful and , but some reviews call her lectures boring or her material outdated.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised for responsiveness, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades , and a few major graded items.

Format shift

Online assessment details are limited, while , and few graded components.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person reviews describe easy or manageable material but inconsistent teaching quality and .

Main concern

Lectures can be boring, outdated, or unhelpful depending on the course.

What students said

“Unless you need some easy units, this class is a total waste.”
CCCTDM10
“ and do the lab and you should at least get a C.”
CCTIS10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and answers questions, but falling behind is risky.

Main concern

The course can become hard to recover from if work piles up.

What students said

“she gets back to you quickly and really answers questions”
CCCTDM10
“do not get behind in this class because you'll never catch back up”
CCCTDM10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but suggests standard quizzes or written exams rather than clearly student-friendly or strictly proctored testing.

QuizzesWritten ExamsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and written exams, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, closed-book rules, or proctoring.

QuizzesWritten ExamsFew Graded Items
“The grade and quizzes.”
CCTIS10
“ ”
CMPSC01

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and do the lab and you should at least get a C.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“Kathy is great! she really takes her time with you and answers any questions”

📈 Easy A Potential

76/100

“Unless you need some easy units, this class is a total waste.”

⚖️

68/100

“Although there are only a few things that are used to generate your grade if you do the work and participate you will pass with ease.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she gets back to you quickly and really answers questions
  • Lectures are boring.
  • Kathy does a very good job of keeping the class moving and on topic

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The subject material is not difficult at all
  • and do the lab and you should at least get a C.
  • , and .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • do not get behind in this class because you'll never catch back up
  • The grade and quizzes.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across several courses give useful patterns, but opinions are mixed and only one online review limits format confidence.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CMPSC013 reviews
CCCTDM102 reviews
CCTIS101 review
CCTIS1381 review
CMPSC131 review
Show 1 more courses
SPCOM91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1