AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Gurpreet Deol

MATH8 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are highly independent and have no realistic alternative.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveUnderpreparedPoor online organizationHigh failure riskFew graded items
  • The only review is extremely negative and says the professor was unavailable, underprepared, and disorganized.
  • Homework and risk when few things determine the grade.
  • Evidence is limited to one online review, so confidence is low despite the severe warning.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

The and and the setup can make it easy to fail.

All evidence comes from one online review, and there is no in-person evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course feels very hard because the professor is described as underprepared, unavailable, and because concepts are well supported.

Only online evidence exists, so no format comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does not clearly .

The single online , and there are no in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The student strongly warns against the class due to poor accessibility, preparation, communication, and .

All recommendation evidence is from one online review, with no in-person evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

The review says few grading categories and .

Format shift

Only the online review provides grading evidence; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload volume is not fully described, but and .

Format shift

Only online evidence exists, and .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

The review describes the professor as , and nonresponsive.

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists, and there is no in-person comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The and tests weigh the same.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions homework and tests equally, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online review reports poor communication, underprepared lectures, , and a high failure risk.

Main concern

Students may need to learn independently because support and organization are described as very weak.

What students said

“ .”
MATH8
“ .”
MATH8
“HW and easy to FAIL.”
MATH8

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review only proves that ; it does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Tests Equal Homework WeightHigh Failure Risk

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The and tests weigh the same, but it does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Tests Equal Homework WeightHigh Failure Risk
“HW and easy to FAIL.”
MATH8

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the , and ; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“She was underprepared for .”

📨 Accessibility

5/100

“There were a handful of times I emailed her with questions and got no response at all.”

⚖️

10/100

“HW and easy to FAIL.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was underprepared for .
  • or her zoom link was put up 10 minutes before class.

Theme 2

📉 About Support and Risk

  • .
  • There were a handful of times I emailed her with questions and got no response at all.
  • HW and easy to FAIL.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the severe negative signal is important but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH81 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values