AI Rate Professor

English

Roxanne Bonjean-Coleman

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENG2006 · ENGLISH151 · ENGLISH1A · ENG1511988 · ENGL2 · ENG151 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Consider her online if available, but be cautious with because organization and reliability are recurring concerns.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganizedInconsistent gradingMixed teaching qualityHelpful onlineExtra credit
  • but often criticize disorganization and .
  • The single online review , and prompt email replies.
  • Grades can be manageable with effort, but the experience depends heavily on format and tolerance for inconsistency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with effort and , but disorganization and .

Online evidence suggests an easier A, while in-person reviews describe a more uneven effort-reward experience.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The content is usually described as manageable English work, but organization problems can make it harder than the material itself.

The online review calls the class fairly easy, while because of structure and assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not prove a , but one student says absent work could not be turned in for credit.

The attendance concern appears only in in-person evidence, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low overall because , and poor communication despite some positive experiences.

The single online review recommends her, but and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

The and , while in-person reviews mention rigid or inconsistent grading practices.

Format shift

Online grading looks lenient and clear, while .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Some students report many assignments and difficulty keeping up, while others call the class fairly easy if they do the work.

Format shift

Online workload seems manageable, but in-person workload varies by student and organization issues.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching feedback is mixed, but and professionalism outweigh the positive comments.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is strong from one review, while and often negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and paragraph assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with some students praising creativity and help, but many calling the and unreliable.

Main concern

The main concern is disorganization, inconsistent expectations, and .

What students said

“ and all over the place.”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENG1511988
“she contradicts herself constantly.”
ENG151

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The one online review is strongly positive, describing an easy class with , and extra credit.

Main concern

The online evidence is based on only one review.

What students said

“it was fairly easy.”
ENGL1A
“ , and gives a lot of feedback.”
ENGL1A
“She also assigns a good deal of work.”
ENGL1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyAssignment-Focused Course

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but do not clearly prove exam format or .

AssignmentsQuizzes MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“ practically being the same number of points as quizzes.”
ENG151

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or Lockdown Browser requirements.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and all over the place.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“ and all over the place.”

📈 Grade Path

62/100

“You'll get an A if you put in effort.”

💻 Online Experience

75/100

“ , and gives a lot of feedback.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Roxanne is great at making one think creatively, however .
  • She was scatterbrained and did not encourage independent thinking/creative writing.
  • and funny.

Theme 2

📚 About Organization & Work

  • and all over the place.
  • she contradicts herself constantly.
  • so make sure you have copies of your essays.

Theme 3

📈

  • You'll get an A if you put in effort.
  • , and gives a lot of feedback.
  • She also assigns a good deal of work.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span many years and include rich comments, but opinions are inconsistent and online evidence has only one review.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG1513 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENG15119881 review
ENG1A1 review
ENG20061 review
Show 3 more courses
ENGL21 review
ENGLISH1511 review
ENGLISH1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Pass 1