AI Rate Professor

English

Meryl Soto

ENG10 · ENGLISH151 · ENGL151 · CENGL0273 · ENG1B · ENG151 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are independent, resilient, and comfortable with , and exacting expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderStrict attendanceLots of quizzesConfusing directionsPolarizing teaching
  • Reviews are sharply divided, but negative comments , and poor support.
  • Success depends on attending every class, participating, reading, and following her exact formatting expectations.
  • Online reviews are especially negative, while but many serious warnings.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for strong writers who attend, read, and follow her exact rules, but as strict and unpredictable.

Online reviews mention long assignments and favoritism, while , and rigid expectations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The content is not always described as intellectually impossible, but , and strict expectations raise the difficulty.

Online comments emphasize writing-heavy assignments, while , and classroom expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

because many reviews say missing class causes major problems and participation matters.

Attendance evidence is mainly in-person, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend her because they , and poor help when confused.

Online evidence is negative, and in-person evidence is polarized but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say grades depend on doing work exactly her way.

Format shift

Online reviews suggest favoritism and long writing demands, while and rigid rules.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews describe lots of , and multiple long writing assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention three major long assignments, while and .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students call her thorough and helpful, but many describe her as .

Format shift

Online reviews are mostly negative about communication, while but include many severe complaints.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Assessment , and readings rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention large writing assignments, while , and homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with , and inconsistent support.

Main concern

Students say and low tolerance for questions can derail the class.

What students said

“Nothing is ever good enough for her”
ENG151
“There's lots to do, and ”
ENG151
“She told me to find help elsewhere and stop asking her questions.”
CENGL0273

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative overall, citing , and little help with questions.

Main concern

Students report poor communication and harsh treatment online.

What students said

“Three big assignments, between 1800 and 2300 words.”
ENG10
“The .”
ENG1B
“She was incredibly rude and did not answer questions.”
ENG1B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly mention quizzes and major writing assignments, but they do not clearly prove formal exam format, open-book rules, or proctoring policies.

Frequent QuizzesMajor Writing Assignments

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and heavy testing when readings are not completed, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or proctoring policy.

Frequent QuizzesReading-Based QuizzesParticipation Matters
“ ”
ENG151
“My class was heavily tested because people never did the readings.”
ENG151

Online

Online reviews mention major writing assignments and cheating accusations on papers, but do .

Major Writing AssignmentsPaper-Based Assessment
“Three big assignments, between 1800 and 2300 words.”
ENG10
“She accused students of ”
ENG1B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Very Repetitive and confusing.”

⚖️

25/100

“If you dont do things her way you wont get very far.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“There's lots to do, and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She grades fairly and she teaches well.
  • Very Repetitive and confusing.
  • She was totally disconnected with what I needed.
  • Ms. Soto is a very thorough professor.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Nothing is ever good enough for her
  • If you dont do things her way you wont get very far.
  • Somehow I got a C+ in the class.I think she gives you the grade she wants to.
  • Do them and you pass.

Theme 3

🚨 About Support & Communication

  • I got no response.
  • She told me it was my fault and that she was not willing to help me.
  • She was incredibly rude and did not answer questions.
  • She told me to find help elsewhere and stop asking her questions.

Theme 4

🧭

  • Miss a couple of classes in a row you will feel pretty lost.
  • Never miss a class because she hates that
  • Participation matters
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several years provide detailed, repeated patterns despite polarized opinions.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1519 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
ENGL1512 reviews
1511 review
CENGL02731 review
Show 2 more courses
ENG101 review
ENGLISH1511 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1