AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Thomas Newell

CCTPG05 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you need clear instruction or a strong introduction to programming.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor TeachingOutdated MaterialsNot Beginner FriendlyNeeds Teaching Aid
  • The only review strongly criticizes his ability to teach introductory programming.
  • The student earned an A, but the comments suggest learning quality was very poor.
  • There is no online evidence and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

One student got an A, but the high difficulty rating and harsh teaching comments make the and likely high.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The course is presented as a poor introduction to programming, with outdated support and limited effective instruction.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The and says he should be replaced.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The student received an A, but there is .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The high difficulty rating suggests the course felt demanding, but workload details are not described.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The review says he is not capable of teaching effectively and uses outdated presentations.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review does not describe .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with no assessment breakdown.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The , and poor fit for beginners.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves because the instruction is described as ineffective.

What students said

“He doesn't keep up with current programming and is not a good intro to programming teacher.”
CCTPG05
“The teacher uses an older teachers presentations to teach and isn't very capable of teaching his students without a Teachers Aid.”
CCTPG05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He doesn't keep up with current programming and is not a good intro to programming teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“The teacher uses an older teachers presentations to teach and isn't very capable of teaching his students without a Teachers Aid.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“I hope he gets replaced for the sake of the students who actually want to learn programming.”

📚 Course Fit

25/100

“He doesn't keep up with current programming and is not a good intro to programming teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The teacher uses an older teachers presentations to teach and isn't very capable of teaching his students without a Teachers Aid.
  • He doesn't keep up with current programming and is not a good intro to programming teacher.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • I hope he gets replaced for the sake of the students who actually want to learn programming.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only , so the negative signal is strong but not broadly verified.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CCTPG051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values