AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

John Leamy

MATH17 · MATH8 · PREALGEBRA · PCALC17AB · MATH602 · MATH17A · MATH101 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
73/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Take him if you are willing to ask questions and keep up with test preparation, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful when askedSometimes unclearFair teacherTest-heavy grading
  • Most students describe him as helpful and .
  • Teaching clarity is inconsistent, with some students praising explanations and others finding lectures .
  • , so recovery after a poor exam can be difficult.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is possible with steady work and help-seeking, but and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The math content is manageable for some students, but fast pacing and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and helpful, but concerns about clarity keep the recommendation from being strong.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but and can be hard to recover from.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Students mention needing to do the work, but they do not describe the workload as extreme.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students call him helpful and clear, while a .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, while assignments are mentioned less often.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a generally helpful math teacher with uneven clarity and .

Main concern

Students may need extra help because .

What students said

“Sometimes the and .”
MATH8
“ and easy to understand.”
PREALGEBRA
“speeds through sections.”
MATH17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show tests carry major grade weight, but they do not .

Test-Heavy Grading

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly describe exam rules or format.

Test-Heavy Grading
“The so it is hard to recover if you bomb a test.”
MATH8

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I found myself needing extra help to succeed in his class, but he was very open to questions!”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and help access. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ ! He explained it so I understood.”

⚖️

58/100

“The so it is hard to recover if you bomb a test.”

💬 Helpfulness

68/100

“Great Teacher. Is willing to help if you ask.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and easy to understand.
  • Sometimes the and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I found his class to be easy but you have to do the work and put forth the effort to pass his class.
  • I hate math but I got an A in his class!
  • The so it is hard to recover if you bomb a test.

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • He does everything he can to make sure you understand and gave us the !
  • Willing to help you out. Just ask questions, he is very reasonable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven older reviews give consistent themes, but the evidence is dated and lacks recent detail.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1011 review
MATH171 review
MATH17A1 review
MATH6021 review
MATH81 review
Show 2 more courses
PCALC17AB1 review
PREALGEBRA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values