AI Rate Professor

English

Jeanna Fox

ENG151 · ENG1A · ENG9769 · ENG1 · ENGL9575 · ENG9575 · ENG1036 · ENG1C · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you can handle a personality-driven class with inconsistent teaching clarity and writing-based effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFun PersonalityConfusing LessonsMixed Teaching QualityWork RequiredFew Tests
  • Students are split between finding her fun and and ineffective.
  • Getting an A usually requires real writing effort, even when some students say the class can be easy.
  • The course seems more assignment and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students call it easy, but multiple comments say she does not hand out A's and students had to work for one.

All evidence comes from in-person English reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The course is not intellectually extreme, but English 1C and writing expectations make it more than a simple blowoff.

Only in-person comments describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on whether students value her fun and uneven learning.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Students report but also say she does not hand out A's.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload appears manageable but requires real writing effort, especially for an A.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Students praise her energy and care but and limited learning.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and the fact that she hates giving tests.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, praising her energy and care while and weak learning value.

Main concern

Teaching clarity is inconsistent and several students say they did not learn much.

What students said

“ and does talk about her life a lot.”
ENG1C
“This class was pointless. she doesnt teach much”
ENG1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , so exam risk appears low but details are limited.

Few Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove the format of any test, midterm, or final.

Few Tests
“ .”
ENG1C

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A but definitly had to work for an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“I did not learn a lot from her.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

58/100

“She is not easy and does not hand out A's.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

52/100

“ ! The instructor is very hard to learn from.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a good teacher.
  • and does talk about her life a lot.
  • This class was pointless. she doesnt teach much

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is not easy and does not hand out A's.
  • definitly had to work for an A.
  • easy A that is if she marks ur hw down.

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • Jeanna does care about her students.
  • I am happy with her personality.
  • Her class if fun and helpful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years show a consistent split between positive personality comments and negative teaching clarity concerns.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG12 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENG10361 review
ENG1511 review
ENG1A1 review
Show 3 more courses
ENG95751 review
ENG97691 review
ENGL95751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values