AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Christina Hewett

NURS205 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable learning independently and handling poor communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized communicationTest heavyFast-paced lecturesClear grading for somePolarizing experience
  • Recent online reviews describe rude behavior, weak support, and .
  • Older positive reviews say lectures, modules, and .
  • The course can be passable with practice, but the student experience is highly inconsistent.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A grades by doing practice problems and assignments, but , and poor support that make the A costly.

Most evidence is online and mixed, while the and conflicting to change the overall judgment.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Dosage math can be manageable, but , and weak organization make the course feel difficult.

Online reviews contain most complaints about pace and organization, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, but reviews do not prove a .

Online reviews mention attendance as part of grading, while in-person .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Many recent students strongly discourage taking her because of rude communication, confusion, and lack of help.

Online reviews drive the low recommendation, while and one strong endorsement.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tags and comments point to tough grading and test-heavy evaluation, though .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading and tests most often, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Students mention lots of , and module assessments.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most workload evidence, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive reviews praise clarity, but many recent reviews describe , rude behavior, and poor support.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is highly polarized, while and mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

, and module assessments as the main graded items.

Format shift

Online reviews clearly describe exams and module assessments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person evidence is limited and conflicting, with one very negative review and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“She is the worst”
NURS-205
“Professor is very straightforward and clear. She also encourages students to ask questions and her lectures are great!”
NURS-205

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply split, with many recent complaints about rudeness, confusion, and slow communication despite older praise for .

Main concern

Communication and support are unreliable.

What students said

“The and by then the .”
NURS-205
“the lectures were often too fast-paced and not well-explained, leaving students struggling to keep up with the material.”
NURS-205
“ and the module that she uses for this class was straight to the point and had very good practice problems at the end.”
NURS-205

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe a and module assessments, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyExamsModule Assessments

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Online

Online reviews support a test-heavy structure with exams and module assessments, but do not clearly .

Test HeavyExamsModule Assessments
“There , and assignments.”
NURS-205
“She , and the module assessments.”
NURS-205

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“The , and the class lacked engagement and structure.A BIG NO TO HER CLASS!”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“Never taking her classes again. She just demotivated me when I seeked for help.”

⚖️

30/100

“the lectures were often too fast-paced and not well-explained, leaving students struggling to keep up with the material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The professor was rude and unprofessional, making it difficult to learn and feel comfortable in the class.
  • Professor Hewett is a knowledgeable, respectful, and efficient instructor.
  • Professor is very straightforward and clear.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Exams

  • There , and assignments.
  • Class is good not that hard but lots of .
  • She , and the module assessments.

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • The and by then the .
  • the course materials were poorly organized, and there was a lack of and frustration.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 20 recent and older reviews with detailed but polarized comments, mostly from online sections.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

NURS-20520 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 3 · A 3

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4 · Rather not say 3