AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Dionne Perez

PSYCH118 · PSYCH120 · COUNS120 · COUNC120 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you can tolerate disorganization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized modulesMixed teaching qualityExtra creditCaring for someCommunication issues
  • Reviews are highly mixed, with some students praising care and motivation while others warn against taking the class.
  • The work is often not conceptually hard, but organization, deadlines, and communication can create stress.
  • and a free textbook help grades, but unclear modules and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades can , and a free textbook, but disorganization and confusing requirements can still derail students.

Online evidence includes one easy A and two major warnings, while but also confusing workloads.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is often described as easy, but poor module organization and .

Both formats mention manageable work, but online reviews stress Canvas and communication problems while and deadlines.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Participation matters in several reviews, but no review clearly proves a .

Both formats mention participation or discussions, but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendations are divided, but the strongest negative reviews warn about disorganization, poor communication, and dropping the class.

Online reviews lean risky because of communication complaints, while but still inconsistent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, a free textbook, and easy assignments and requirements.

Format shift

, while online reviews include one very high grade and easy assignments.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Assignments are not usually hard, but students mention , and .

Format shift

Online workload evidence is mixed, while , papers, and deadlines.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Some students find her caring and motivating, but others describe disorganization, poor communication, and confusing course design.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is polarized, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention quizzes, a , and papers.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide the clearest assessment list, while and papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews range from inspiring and , and strongly negative.

Main concern

Organization and due dates can make an otherwise manageable class frustrating.

What students said

“The work itself is not hard, but the .”
COUNC-120
“A lot of discussions and 11:59 PM”
COUNS120
“It was an easy, fun and very helpful class.”
COUNC-120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are split between one very positive easy-A experience and two strong complaints about communication and .

Main concern

Online communication and .

What students said

“ .”
COUNC-120
“Misrepresented. .”
PSYCH118
“ .”
PSYCH118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a project, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Two QuizzesMidtermFinalProjectAssignments

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, a final, and a project, but not proctoring or open-book rules.

Two QuizzesMidtermFinalProject
“There are 2 quizzes, a , and a project.”
COUNC-120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The work itself is not hard, but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, organization, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“The .”

👍 Recommendation Risk

38/100

“If you want .”

⚖️

70/100

“she provides a huge amount of , a free textbook, and the lectures are short.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she was a great teacher who cares for her students and has very good lesson planning.
  • Professor Perez is also so great. Very understanding and loving.
  • Misrepresented. .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload and Organization

  • The work itself is not hard, but the .
  • A lot of discussions and 11:59 PM
  • .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • .
  • Difficult to reach her if shes your online teacher.
  • I learned a lot in her class and !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 8 reviews over several years with detailed but inconsistent experiences across online and in-person formats.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COUNC-1203 reviews
COUNS1202 reviews
PSYCH1182 reviews
PSYCH1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1