AI Rate Professor

Counseling & Educational Psych

Najia Azizi

COUNS7232 · SOCIO142 · SOCIO130 · SOC250 · COUNS120 · 36 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
61.11%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if you are detail-oriented and can follow rubrics closely, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardStrict graderClear rubricsReading heavyParticipation mattersMixed teaching experience
  • Grades depend heavily on following detailed instructions and formatting rules.
  • Many students find her organized and clear, but and .
  • Online reviews are more polarized, while and support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible by following instructions carefully, but and formatting rules make mistakes costly.

, while in-person evidence more often says the class is easy if you do the work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course content is usually straightforward, but , and detailed rubrics add friction.

Online courses feel more rule-heavy, while as clear and manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation and as necessary, especially in in-person classes.

, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and discussion timing.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend her when they value structure, but many warn against her strict and .

In-person reviews are more positive overall, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, formatting, and harsh penalties.

Format shift

Online reviews show the , while but still mention toughness.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Work is steady and reading-based, with some students calling it manageable and others calling it demanding.

Format shift

Online reviews mention more homework and reading pressure, while as consistent.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and sometimes supportive, but reviews are split by , and boring delivery.

Format shift

In-person students praise organization more often, while online students report more negative communication experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and written assignments more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats are mostly assignment-driven, with online reviews also mentioning quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students more often praise her organization and helpful structure, though attendance and participation are important.

Main concern

Some students find lectures boring or attendance-driven.

What students said

“Professor , and responded to all emails in a timely manner.”
COUNS120
“she does not teach. ! easy class if you understand common sense”
COUNS120

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report clear assignments but , and low tolerance for mistakes.

Main concern

Small formatting or instruction .

What students said

“This .”
COUNS120
“Read the material, follow the rubric, and you'll do fine.”
SOCIO130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, a midterm, and a final paper, but do .

Quizzes MentionedTests Open For About A WeekMidterm MentionedFinal Reflection Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and final, but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring rules.

Midterm MentionedFinal Mentioned
“Take the class, 4 1500 word papers, a midterm and a final.”
SOC250

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and tests being open for about a week, but .

Quizzes MentionedTests Open For About A WeekMidterm MentionedFinal Reflection Paper
“When it's time for a quiz and , so plenty of .”
COUNS120
“There was an /someone who has a job that interests you, & a final reflection paper.”
COUNS120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Read the material, follow the rubric, and you'll do fine.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Professor , and responded to all emails in a timely manner.”

⚖️

28/100

“Too strict with details. .”

👍 Recommendation Level

52/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and no tricks.
  • Professor Azizi knows her stuff, but the delivery is horrible.
  • She's passionate about gender studies and it shows in her teaching style.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This .
  • If you follow directions, the course is simple and manageable.
  • You will get an easy A if you follow instructions and .

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Rules

  • MUST HAVE MICROSOFT WORD , she only accepts .
  • You will have to read the textbook as the discussions and .
  • Collaboration and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

36

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 37 reviews across many years and both formats, with , and participation.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 55
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

COUNS12026 reviews
SOCIO1424 reviews
SOCIO1303 reviews
COUNS72322 reviews
SOC2502 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 3 · A 15

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1