AI Rate Professor

Art History

Kevin Levine

ART190 · ART118 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you like art history and can learn from readings and study guides, but lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPassionate about artMonotone lecturesReading-heavyFew assignmentsMixed grading fairness
  • Students agree he knows and cares about art, but delivery is often described as monotone.
  • The workload is not always large, but , and .
  • Recommendation depends strongly on whether the student already likes art and can handle lecture-heavy teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible, but , and for uninterested students.

Online reviews suggest manageable assignments, while and effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The content is manageable but , and harder for students who do not already enjoy art.

Online students mention papers and lecture videos, while and study guides.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly establish an .

Neither online nor .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend him mainly for art-interested learners, while others warn that monotone lectures and .

Online feedback is moderately positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Grades can be good, but one and another labels him a .

Format shift

, while online reviews describe clearer expectations.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

There are only a few assignments in some sections, but reading and .

Format shift

Online work includes papers and weekly assignments, while , and tests.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He is knowledgeable and passionate, but multiple students say monotone delivery hurts learning.

Format shift

Both formats mention monotone delivery, with online students especially affected by lecture videos.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and tests.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention midterms and papers, while , and few assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split between knowledgeable, useful lectures and complaints about monotone delivery and .

Main concern

Non-art majors may find the grading and lectures frustrating.

What students said

“ ”
ART190
“ if you need the credits for transfer/ degree.”
ART190
“although his lectures were long, they were interesting and full of useful information.”
ART190

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and manageable work, but one student found lectures hard to watch because of his monotone voice.

Main concern

Lecture videos may feel dull and the course involves reading and papers.

What students said

“he has a really really really monotone voice which made it difficult to watch lectures.”
ART190
“ but not too hard.”
ART118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited but suggests standard multiple-choice or .

Multiple-choice midtermsStudy guide testsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests supported by a study guide but do not clearly prove closed-book or .

Study guide testsReviews do not clearly prove closed-book policy
“study the study guide given, pass the test, pass class.”
ART190

Online

Online reviews mention multiple-choice midterms but do not clearly .

Multiple-choice midtermsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy
“ ”
ART190

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you don't like art.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in lecture style, workload, and fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“he is a bit monotone, & while thats not an issue for me I understand how it might be for others.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

48/100

“ if you don't like art.”

⚖️

45/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Levine was , and was willing to answer any questions.
  • he has a really really really monotone voice which made it difficult to watch lectures.
  • , but it helps because he makes you read.

Theme 2

📚 About Work and Assessments

  • All midterms were multiple choice and most of the .
  • but not too hard.
  • there are only a few assignments.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fit and Grading

  • If youre not an Art major and just need an .
  • I worked harder in his class than my upper level writing classes.
  • if you need the credits for transfer/ degree.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they span several years and repeat the same strengths and weaknesses.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1906 reviews
ART1181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values