AI Rate Professor

Health

Nikki Ferguson

KINE3225 · HED120 · KINES220 · HED1205713 · ECON238 · HED110 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself, writing often, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderSlow GradingHeavy WritingUnclear InstructionsNot Recommended
  • Students , and harsh deductions.
  • Online reviews are especially , and no direct lectures.
  • A few students earned A grades, but many say the process felt stressful and poorly supported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned A grades, but , and heavy writing make the A feel unreliable.

, while in-person evidence says the class can be easy but still poorly graded.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The course content often sounds basic, but and poor organization make it harder than it should be.

Online reviews emphasize confusing course design, while but poorly taught.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly advise against taking the class because of , and .

Both formats are negative, with online reviews giving more detailed complaints about workload and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly say minor and .

Format shift

Online and students also stressing late grade posting.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Frequent essays, discussion posts, reading, and easy content.

Format shift

Online reviews show the clearest heavy writing load, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe unclear , and little student support.

Format shift

Online reviews cite no direct lectures and vague materials, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and written assignments rather than clearly described exams.

Format shift

Online reviews mention papers, discussions, and quizzes most often, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are also mostly negative, with , and poor teaching.

Main concern

Students report harsh grading and easy.

What students said

“he doesn't even know how to teach or grade work.”
KINE3225
“This class is an easy A, but professor clearly does a poor job.”
HED110
“So much work and for what.”
HED1205713

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and little direct teaching.

Main concern

Students often do not know their real grade until late because papers and .

What students said

“There are from him directly.”
HED120
“Takes forever to grade.”
HED110
“ and discussions were on random topics that had nothing to do with the required readings.”
HED120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy tags, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Quiz HeavyTest Heavy MentionedExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

Weekly QuizzesFinal PresentationPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“he gave quizes every week”
HED120
“at the end of the ”
HED120

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and test-heavy tags, but do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exams.

Online QuizzesTest Heavy MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“you are at 95+ based only from the ”
HED110
“He even give the quizzes but they are all wrong answers”
ECON238

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“I barely learned anything in this class.”

⚖️

18/100

“ space error”

👍 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • There are from him directly.
  • I barely learned anything in this class.
  • Simply horrible and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • GPA tanked because of him.
  • He tanks ur grade so much based on minor mistakes.
  • Takes long to grade and will dock you significantly for not following every small detail.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Be ready to write over 2500 words a week.
  • A lot of .
  • So much work and for what.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews across several years are detailed and , and poor support.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 514

Course coverage

HED1208 reviews
HED1106 reviews
KINE32253 reviews
ECON2381 review
HED12057131 review
Show 1 more courses
KINES2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1