AI Rate Professor

History

Sonya Dugas

AFRAM113 · AFRAM122 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
30.77%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take this professor only if , and a lot of independent learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesLate gradingTough graderReading and writing heavyCaring but inconsistent
  • Many students say lectures drift off topic and do not prepare them well for assignments or tests.
  • Online reviews are more positive about support and learning, but and .
  • hard to improve during the semester.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show tough , and delayed feedback make the A costly.

Online evidence mentions but , while in-person evidence shows more confusion and lower outcomes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content itself is often described as basic or interesting, but the class feels harder because and disorganized.

Online students call the course tough but understandable with guidance, while not explained.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears often, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both formats mention participation, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most negative , and hard tests despite a few positive comments.

Online reviews , but both formats include serious concerns.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Several students call her a tough grader, and low grades .

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough grading plus , while and test complaints.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students , and lecture-heavy expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews stress reading and assignments, while and lecture-heavy work.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

She is often described as caring or knowledgeable, but many students say , and disorganized.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mixed to positive, while and lecture usefulness.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and participation rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

Online reviews mention homework, discussions, quizzes, and exams, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students more often describe disorganized lectures, off-topic classes, and weak alignment between lectures and graded work.

Main concern

The main concern is that lectures often do not explain what students need for .

What students said

“The material wasn't explained, and the .”
AFRAM-122
“no class materials taught at all . always went off topic and .”
AFRAM-113

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students describe a tough but sometimes rewarding class with , and .

Main concern

The main concern is heavy work with and .

What students said

“Her instructions for projects and .”
AFRAM-113
“Prepare to study hard because the class is tough but interesting.”
AFRAM-122

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring requirements.

Tough TestsExam Evidence LimitedHeavy Preparation Needed

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Hard TestsExam Format Not Clearly Proven
“the .”
AFRAM-122
“Test heavy”
AFRAM-122

Online

Online reviews mention homework and exams but do not clearly prove the policy.

Exam Format Not Clearly ProvenTough Grading
“She is a .”
AFRAM-122
“ .”
AFRAM-122

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Class was difficult to follow. Did not grade more than two assignments total until after the class had ended”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“always went off topic and .”

⚖️

30/100

“It's common for .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“A lot of reading and assignments and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She talks through a majority of the class but its all basic info you probably already know.
  • Had very little assignments, which might seem like a good thing but majority of them were not about the class's topic.
  • Very good teacher, I learn a lot in her class

Theme 2

⚖️

  • semester, so it was annoying.
  • She offers plenty of .
  • She is a .

Theme 3

📚 About Difficulty

  • Very difficult . Have to do everything on your own especially materials , no class materials taught at all .
  • Prepare to study hard because the class is tough but interesting.
  • It's pretty easy though.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen recent reviews across both formats give consistent detail about disorganization, grading delays, workload, and .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

AFRAM-1229 reviews
AFRAM-1134 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 2 · A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2