AI Rate Professor

Administration Of Justice

John Sanford

ADJUS120 · ADJ121 · ADJ120 · ADJUS122 · ADJUS223 · ADJUS129 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Sanford only if required and , and limited teaching support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGroup Work HeavyUnorganizedReading HeavyStrict DeadlinesLow Engagement
  • Online reviews are strongly negative about late responses, group work, and unforgiving deadlines.
  • saying the routine is passable if you read, attend, and participate.
  • Grades can be good, but students often describe the process as frustrating and poorly supported.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Many students earned A grades, but they , and participation demands as the real cost.

Online evidence is more negative about deadlines and group work, while if you read, attend, and participate.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is not described as conceptually brutal, but the class feels harder because it is book heavy and .

Online reviews emphasize workload pressure, while , and participation.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation appear important, and several reviews warn that skipping class hurts your chance to pass.

Online flexibility is reduced by group work and strict deadlines, while and participating.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

because they describe weak teaching, disorganization, heavy group work, and poor communication.

, while in-person reviews include a few positive routine-based experiences but remain mostly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades are often high, but , and no forgiveness for mistakes.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews are mixed and sometimes say he does not grade harshly.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of , and last-minute work.

Format shift

Online students stress weekly assignment overload, while in-person students stress book-heavy work and papers.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students often describe him as , and dependent on group work instead of teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on poor communication and course management, while and student-led work.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments describe grades as driven mostly by , and occasional quizzes.

Format shift

Online evidence points to assignments and group work, while and pop quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are split, but many criticize , and attendance pressure.

Main concern

Students often say he relies on groups and .

What students said

“He makes you all talk amongst yourselves until the end of class.”
ADJUS120
“Sometimes he gave lectures, but not very engaging.”
ADJUS120
“It was not a hard class, but this class is very book heavy.”
ADJ121

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students mostly report disorganization, , and unforgiving deadlines.

Main concern

Asynchronous online classes still use group work and strict due dates with weak support.

What students said

“ , and if he makes a mistake it falls on you, not him.”
ADJUS120
“ .”
ADJ121
“ .”
ADJUS120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention pop quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove a .

Pop QuizzesMidterm MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one easy midterm, but do not clearly prove a .

Pop QuizzesMidterm Mentioned
“ as long as you study.”
ADJUS120
“ ”
ADJUS120

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove the final format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Simple as it is.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“He kept having my class lag on work, never taught us anything, and posted all the .”

⚖️

50/100

“Frequent and .”

📚 Workload

25/100

“SO MUCH READING but he is a very funny prof.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He does not interact with students in Pronto.
  • Sometimes he gave lectures, but not very engaging.
  • He would sit on his computer all period and not acknowledge his students.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • a lot of homework and
  • You ABSOLUTLY have to read the book or you WILL NOT PASS.

Theme 3

👥 About Group Work

  • He gives you group work in classes that are asychronous classes.
  • Students are split in groups and lecture each week instead of him
  • Uses team structures for work that does not require it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 22 reviews span several years and show consistent themes across online and in-person formats.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ADJUS12012 reviews
ADJ1203 reviews
ADJ1213 reviews
ADJUS1222 reviews
ADJUS1291 review
Show 1 more courses
ADJUS2231 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 9

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1