AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Michele Redlo

NURS212 · 212NURSE · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.4/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you , and handle difficult exams with little guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized courseSelf-taught experienceTest heavyPoor communicationHarsh exam alignment
  • Students repeatedly describe the class as , and poorly taught.
  • , and sometimes based on another instructor's materials.
  • Even when students say she is personally nice, they strongly advise taking the course elsewhere.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

31/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments say the grade , and difficult exams.

Online and in-person reviews both describe a hard-earned grade, with online reviews stressing self-teaching and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

The course may be only two credits, but students say the , and .

Both formats describe the course as harder than its unit value, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do , but they do describe prerecorded lectures and limited office-hour support.

Online reviews mention prerecorded lectures and weak office hours, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend avoiding her because the , and exam-heavy.

Both online and in-person reviews are strongly negative, with online comments especially direct about taking the class elsewhere.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report , and unclear grading structures.

Format shift

Both formats show grading concerns, with online reviews emphasizing flawed exams and .

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Students describe lots of reading, frequent exams, study guides, and workload far beyond a two-unit course.

Format shift

Online reviews mention chapters and exams every two weeks, while and .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Reviews repeatedly say she does , and leaves students to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online reviews call it self-taught, while and leaves students unprepared.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Assessment is dominated by tests, exams, study guides, and a .

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention exams every two weeks and a , while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, weak guidance, and exams that require heavy outside reading.

Main concern

Students feel unprepared because lecture material and .

What students said

“Wastes time, , keeps telling us we'll be fine on the tests”
NURS212
“The structure of the class was a mess.”
NURS212
“The lecture material didnt match what was covered in the exams.”
NURS212

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a self-taught, disorganized, test-heavy course with poor communication and difficult exams.

Main concern

Students say exams and lectures are not well aligned and communication is unreliable.

What students said

“Lots of but they are pre recorded.”
NURS212
“do yourself a favor and .”
212NURSE
“It is like taking class without a teacher!”
NURS212

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as frequent, difficult, heavily reading-based, and poorly aligned with lectures, but .

Test HeavyCumulative FinalFrequent ExamsReviews do not clearly prove proctoring policy

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and poorly aligned with lecture, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Lecture-Exam MismatchHeavy Reading NeededDifficult Exams
“ of reading”
NURS212
“The lecture material didnt match what was covered in the exams.”
NURS212

Online

Online reviews mention prerecorded lectures, exams every two weeks, and a cumulative final, but do not clearly .

Exams Every Two WeeksCumulative FinalNCLEX-Style QuestionsReviews do not clearly prove online proctoring
“exam every 2 weeks on 2 chapters and .”
NURS212
“The already in the program or .”
NURS212

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“It is like taking class without a teacher!”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She literally did not teach anything in the class.”

⚠️

18/100

“The lecture material didnt match what was covered in the exams.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“do yourself a favor and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wastes time, , keeps telling us we'll be fine on the tests
  • She literally did not teach anything in the class.
  • It is like taking class without a teacher!

Theme 2

📚

  • Lots of but they are pre recorded.
  • exam every 2 weeks on 2 chapters and .
  • of reading

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • This class was by far the .
  • The structure of the class was a mess.
  • Redlo is the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Nine detailed reviews across both formats are highly consistent, but the sample size is modest.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

NURS2128 reviews
212NURSE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3