AI Rate Professor

English

Ron Lorette

ENGL142B6605 · ENGLC1000 · ENGL1C · ENGL001A · ENG1C · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want stronger writing skills and can keep up with frequent assignments and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardDetailed FeedbackHeavy HomeworkTough GradingWriting ImprovementStrict Deadlines
  • Students often improve and structured assignments.
  • Workload is steady to heavy, especially in online English courses.
  • Grading and deadline enforcement feel strict, with mixed student satisfaction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but students describe frequent homework, , and a need to stay on schedule.

Online evidence shows and manageable modules alongside heavy homework, while and strict deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is standard English writing, but the , and critical thinking demands make it moderately challenging.

Online students call some work manageable, while and writing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation appear important, with reviews warning that skipping or missing required steps can hurt progress.

Online reviews focus on keeping up with modules and required peer review, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend him for writing improvement, but , and for some students create real hesitation.

Online recommendations are polarized, while but similarly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading is often described as critical or tough, though and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention but also tough grading, while and large late penalties.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and regular module tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most workload evidence and consistently mention homework, while and writing.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

and improve writing, but students disagree sharply on clarity and support.

Format shift

Online reviews range from caring and detailed to vague and unhelpful, while but educational.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment evidence centers on essays, modules, , and written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments and participation tasks, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a challenging writing class with , and useful writing development.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“grades hard, attendance matters, do every assignment, barely late work is accepted”
ENGL142B6605
“The class was challenging & enjoyable. Lots of reading & writing!”
ENGL001A

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with strong praise for feedback and structure but repeated concerns , and one withdrawal experience.

Main concern

Online students must stay current because missed work and .

What students said

“Make sure to keep up on the modules and youll be fine.”
ENGL-C1000
“Has tons of homework, but it's doable.”
ENGL1C
“ .”
ENGL1C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals, so .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very critical with assignments, but the writing and your grades.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Very critical with assignments, but the writing and your grades.”

⚖️

35/100

“grades hard, attendance matters, do every assignment, barely late work is accepted”

📚 Workload

32/100

“Has tons of homework, but it's doable.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He .
  • and .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Provides multiple /point redemption opportunities to obtain a higher grade
  • If the majority of the class gets a D on a that maybe we dont understand his teachings.
  • Class was easy but, you , and on time.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • The workload was quite manageable overall.
  • He does infact assign a lot of assignments
  • Lots of reading & writing!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years , and format differences.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL001A3 reviews
ENG1C2 reviews
ENGL-C10002 reviews
ENGL1C2 reviews
ENGL142B66051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2