AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Max Portillo

COUNS130 · COUNS103B · COUNS120 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a and helps students stay on track.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational mentorBeginner friendlyCaring and attentiveClear expectationsHelpful lectures
  • Students almost unanimously praise him as caring, motivational, and personally invested in student success.
  • The course is beginner-friendly and especially strong for students starting college or needing guidance.
  • Grades appear very attainable, with the one online review noting full credit for late work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

, and the online review reports full credit for late work.

Online evidence shows exceptional late-work leniency, while but focuses more on support than grading mechanics.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

The course feels accessible because , and supports newer students.

In-person reviews strongly support beginner-friendly teaching, while the and understandable assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

65/100

Reviews , though participation matters appears often and online late work was flexible.

Online evidence supports assignment flexibility, while in-person reviews mention participation but do .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and helpful.

Both formats are highly positive, but the recommendation evidence is much stronger for .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

High grades dominate the reviews, and the online section explicitly allowed late work for full credit.

Format shift

Online leniency is explicit, while and clear expectations.

Workload

Light

74/100

Students describe understandable assignments and open-minded participation rather than heavy workload, though some lectures and group work appear.

Format shift

Online work is described as understandable, while , and some group projects.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, inspirational, detailed, patient, and highly helpful.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is extensive, while the single online review also praises structure and attentiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Reviews mainly mention assignments, participation, lectures, and .

Format shift

Online evidence focuses on assignments, while and group projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students consistently praise his lectures, care, accountability, and beginner-friendly support.

Main concern

Some students mention repetition or frequent lectures, but the tone remains strongly positive.

What students said

“This is my first semester in college & I can say that he was very patient & made sure we knew the basics of college.”
COUNS120
“ . Trust”
COUNS103B
“Very detailed and will ask you multiple times if you understand.”
COUNS103B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The single online review describes a well-structured, attentive, and very flexible course with late work accepted for full credit.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited to one review, so confidence is low despite strong praise.

What students said

“he allowed you to turn in all your work late for full credit”
COUNS130
“ and he always went through it detailed.”
COUNS130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Trust”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“Very detailed and will ask you multiple times if you understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ . Trust”

❤️ Student Support

96/100

“I really like that he checked in with everyone, and always reminded us of important stuff.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Interesting lectures and very helpful
  • Very detailed and will ask you multiple times if you understand.
  • He has awesome lectures and also a great counselor.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Max is one of the realest persons I have met.
  • Very cool person. in their education.
  • Professor Portillo is a super cool person!

Theme 3

📈 About Support and Success

  • he allowed you to turn in all your work late for full credit
  • he connected the dots of every lecture and why is it important
  • made sure we knew what we needed in order to succeed

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 9 reviews with very consistent praise, but the sample is smaller and online evidence has only one review.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

COUNS103B4 reviews
COUNS1203 reviews
COUNS1302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values