AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Sharare Sharoki

PHILO130 · HUM120 · PHILO120 · PHIL110 · PHIL130 · HUMAN120 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
53.33%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Take her if you can handle reading, detailed instructions, and participation, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but pickyDetailed feedbackReading requiredParticipation mattersMixed clarity
  • Students often find her supportive and reachable, but several say her expectations are picky or unclear.
  • Getting an A is realistic if students read, follow directions closely, and participate.
  • Online reviews are more divided, while but still mention lecture clarity issues.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is very reachable, but students must read, participate, and match her specific answer style.

and tedious work, while in-person evidence stresses flexibility and doing the reading.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The content is usually manageable, though reading, philosophical concepts, and .

Online reviews call the work straightforward but tedious, while lectures.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Participation matters in several classes, but there is .

and participation more often, while online reviews focus on discussion work.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

Students recommend her when they value support and feedback, but and .

In-person recommendations are more positive overall, while online reviews are sharply split between easy-A praise and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and feedback-rich, but many students say she is picky about answers and writing.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tough or picky grading more often, while .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload is manageable but , and occasional heavy writing.

Format shift

Online reviews report more papers and tedious tasks, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is often described as caring and helpful, but some students find her lectures or .

Format shift

Online students praise feedback and access but criticize clarity, while in-person students praise support but sometimes complain about wandering lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to mix papers, , and reading-based work.

Format shift

Online reviews mention journals, papers, quizzes, discussions, and midterms, while , and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students often praise her kindness and flexibility, but some complain that lectures wander or are .

Main concern

.

What students said

“The coursework in her class was simple but she had specific expectations for the midterms.”
HUMAN120
“Talks in circles ALOT.”
PHIL110
“She is not very strict when it comes to turning in your work on time.”
HUMAN120

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students describe an easy but tedious class with , and .

Main concern

and inconsistent.

What students said

“Professor Sharoki is an easy A, as long as you follow her directions carefully.”
HUMAN120
“Very picky with how she wants questions answered.”
HUMAN120
“Lots of papers/journals.”
HUMAN120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, midterms, and tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, or strict proctoring.

Midterms MentionedQuizzes MentionedTests MentionedStudy Guides Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or .

Midterms MentionedTests MentionedStudy Guides Mentioned
“she had specific expectations for the midterms”
HUMAN120
“ if you do the study guides that she offers.”
PHIL110

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and midterms, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Quizzes MentionedMidterms Mentioned
“I followed her instructions in quizes but it was never up to her expectations.”
HUMAN120
“two midterms and ”
HUMAN120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Sharoki is an easy A, as long as you follow her directions carefully.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ and will work with you if you have any questions.”

⚖️

48/100

“Very picky with how she wants questions answered.”

📚 Workload

50/100

“Tedious work, but easy!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a really cool professor.
  • Talks in circles ALOT.
  • and cares about the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you will surely get the A if .
  • The coursework in her class was simple but she had specific expectations for the midterms.
  • Lots of papers/journals.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • She gave really great feed back
  • and will work with you if you have any questions.
  • She is not very strict when it comes to turning in your work on time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 18 reviews span many years and , and teaching style.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

HUMAN1207 reviews
PHIL1105 reviews
PHIL1302 reviews
PHILO1302 reviews
HUM1201 review
Show 1 more courses
PHILO1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 4 · A 5

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1