AI Rate Professor

English

Judith Saunders

ENGLS2563 · ENG1A · ENG11000 · ENG001C · ENG1C · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take her only if , and unclear expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear essay expectationsHeavy reading and writingStrict attendanceMixed feedback
  • and essay expectations.
  • The course , and quizzes.
  • A few students did well by attending, asking questions, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Getting an A is possible, but students say , and adapting to unclear expectations.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content is typical English reading and writing, but and .

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person English reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

because students say skipping can cause failure or being dropped.

, and they describe it as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking her because grading and .

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Several students call her a and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students , and lots of writing.

Format shift

The workload evidence is entirely in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students find her organized or caring, but and .

Format shift

Teaching-quality .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and quizzes rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are sharply mixed but lean negative because students often , and .

Main concern

Students repeatedly struggle to understand what she wants in essays.

What students said

“Horrible teacher, .”
ENG001C
“If you skip class more than 3 ”
ENG1A
“If you just pay attention to the readings and do the work, you will be fine.”
ENG1C

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and essays but do not clearly describe exam policy.

Quizzes MentionedEssays Heavily Weighted
“a huge chunk of your grade is the 4 essays and the and quizzes.”
ENG1A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible teacher, .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“doesnt know how to teach and .”

⚖️

25/100

“It doesn't matter if if you don't meet her criteria.”

📚 Workload

32/100

“ and writing about what you read about.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and will if it's below a C.
  • She is a little out of date with the media and tv shows.
  • This teacher does .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Horrible teacher, .
  • tough grade.
  • What helped me get an A was talking to her and asking as many questions as i could.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • and writing about what you read about.
  • a huge chunk of your grade is the 4 essays and the and quizzes.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across many years , and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1A4 reviews
ENG1C3 reviews
ENG001C2 reviews
ENG110001 review
ENGLS25631 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values