AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Asad Kabir

PHILO101 · PHILO130 · PHILO110 · PHIL130 · PHILO120 · PHILOSOPHY101 · PHIL3 · PHILO200 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
54.55%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if , and strict expectations for a fair but demanding grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy readingStrict attendanceCaring but demandingExtra creditMixed teaching quality
  • Students often earn A grades, but many say the workload and .
  • Online reviews are much harsher because of , and required office hours.
  • In-person reviews are split between engaging lectures and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A grades are common, but students repeatedly say , and sometimes office hours to earn them.

, while in-person evidence includes both easy-A reports and strict-attendance warnings.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The philosophy content is often described as , and demanding even when the .

Online courses are described as more labor-intensive, while in-person courses feel more .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Multiple reviews say attendance, participation, or online office hours are required and can sharply affect grades.

Both formats show attendance pressure, with online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and feedback, but many warn against taking him if they need flexibility or a light workload.

Online recommendations are highly polarized, while but still mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades can be fair with , but and tough grading on details.

Format shift

Online reviews mention both and harsh deductions, while .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many students describe lots of , and weekly time demands.

Format shift

Online workload is the main complaint, while but less consistently extreme.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Students praise his care, feedback, and some lectures, but , and accent barriers.

Format shift

, while online reviews include more complaints about course structure and copied materials.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews , and participation more than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews focus on weekly assignments and readings, while , and presentations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show better lecture experiences but still mention strict participation, attendance, and .

Main concern

Attendance and class participation can strongly affect the experience.

What students said

“His lectures are profound and while.”
PHILO130
“Don't think about missing a day of class, the teacher will cut down your grade.”
PHILO130

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online classes are often described as reading-heavy and labor-intensive, with and .

Main concern

The online workload can be much heavier than students expect.

What students said

“ if you have literally any other commitments or want to be a human being.”
PHILOSOPHY101
“His class was hard. I would spend 10+ hours a week on it which is a lot for an online class.”
PHILO130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited and mixed, with sheet and most other reviews focusing on assignments.

Cheat Sheet AllowedEasy ExamsAssignments And PapersReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence includes one student-friendly exam comment, but , and attendance.

Cheat Sheet AllowedEasy ExamsFinal Project
“The . He allowed a .”
PHILO101
“The final project was a 7 page paper and a group presentation”
PHILO101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book exams, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You gotta work for your grade, for sure. But .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Mr .”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“I spent more time on this class, than I did on my nursing classes”

⚖️ Grade Cost

58/100

“As long as .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are profound and while.
  • Mr .
  • This is a Professor that has put a 1/16th of the effort into teaching as he requires from the student in work.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You gotta work for your grade, for sure.
  • His class was hard. I would spend 10+ hours a week on it which is a lot for an online class.
  • Honestly, easiest A I have received.

Theme 3

🕒

  • And and .
  • Don't think about missing a day of class, the teacher will cut down your grade.
  • You need to put in at least 12 hours in this class each week to pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 22 reviews span many years, include both formats, and show consistent workload and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHILO1309 reviews
PHILO1203 reviews
PHIL1302 reviews
PHIL32 reviews
PHILO1012 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PHILO1102 reviews
PHILO2001 review
PHILOSOPHY1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1