AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Grant Allen

BUS181 · BUS109 · 41 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
92.68%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a , and engaging professor who makes accounting manageable with steady participation.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear lecturesCaring and supportiveGroup participationManageable workloadFunny and engaging
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and highly supportive.
  • The workload is usually manageable, with , and .
  • Accounting can be challenging, but students say and makes success realistic.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students earn high grades with , and supportive help, though participation and deadlines still matter.

Online reviews show a structured weekly workload, while participate.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Accounting concepts can be confusing at first, but and makes the class doable.

Both formats describe clear expectations, with in-person reviews giving stronger evidence of .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance and participation matter in several reviews, but students also describe him as flexible and supportive.

In-person reviews mention attendance more directly, while and weekly participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend him because , and .

Both online and evidence from in-person classes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students describe him as , and sometimes offering , with many high grades reported.

Format shift

Online reviews explicitly mention fair grading, while and .

Workload

Light

78/100

Most reviews describe the workload as manageable, , and textbook-based lectures.

Format shift

Online reviews mention one weekly assignment plus exams and a project, while .

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly praise his clear , and ability to help them understand accounting.

Format shift

, while online reviews are also very positive but fewer in number.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to mix weekly quizzes or , and a final.

Format shift

Online reviews mention assignments, midterm, final, and group project, while , and group work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

, care, flexibility, and ability to make accounting understandable.

Main concern

Participation, group work, and manageable.

What students said

“ ”
BUS181
“I would 100% take this class again, if it was with this professor.”
BUS181

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise clear instructions, fair grading, provided textbook access, and a manageable weekly structure.

Main concern

.

What students said

“ ”
BUS109
“ , and group project.”
186

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly because open notes and open textbook, while other reviews mention quizzes and .

Open NotesOpen TextbookCanvas TestsMidterm And FinalWeekly Quizzes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes and open textbook, plus weekly quizzes in some classes.

Open NotesOpen TextbookCanvas TestsWeekly Quizzes
“ and open textbook.”
186
“ ”
BUS181

Online

Online reviews mention a midterm and final, but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Midterm And Final
“ , and group project.”
186

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Allen was awesome! While he understood not every student wanted to pursue accounting as a career, he was great at helping us all understand the material and enjoy the class as much as possible.”

Voice snapshots generated from 41 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ the material easier to understand even when it can be challenging.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“I would 100% take this class again, if it was with this professor.”

📚 Workload Balance

78/100

“The workload was manageable, and I was never stressed in his class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This professor really .
  • .

Theme 2

🤝 About Support & Flexibility

  • He is willing to help students no matter what.
  • and understanding, and was really flexible.
  • He listens when he hears someone isn't participating in projects and goes around accordingly.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Material is very straight forward
  • The workload was manageable, and I was never stressed in his class.
  • Overall, the class is doable if you put in the effort.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

41

Recent reviews read by the AI

41

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 41 recent reviews across both formats are detailed and overwhelmingly consistent.

Inside 41 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BUS18134 reviews
1866 reviews
BUS1091 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

25

A+ 5 · A 18 · A- 2

B range

13

B+ 7 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values