AI Rate Professor

Biology

Jeffrey Judd

BIOSC110 · BIO134 · BIO110 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if , and exam preparation beyond the study guide.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLecture HeavyHeavy WorkloadTough ExamsSpecific GradingMixed Personality
  • of reading, handwritten work, and tedious assignments.
  • study guides and material that may not match what students expect.
  • Some students find him nice, funny, flexible, and helpful, but recommendation sentiment is clearly mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but students , and a need to complete every assignment.

The online review reports an A+ with positive tone, while and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The biology content is challenging because lectures, reading, labs, and .

Online evidence suggests learning was manageable, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance seems important for success, with one tag saying students will not pass if , but comments .

Online , while in-person comments suggest attendance and lecture engagement matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Recommendation depends on tolerance for heavy workload and lecture style because positive comments coexist with .

The only online review recommends him strongly, while and often cautious.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Students report , and vague study guides, even though makeup work can help passing.

Format shift

Online evidence mentions clear grading, while and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of , and tedious write-ups.

Format shift

Online evidence does not establish workload, while .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students say he is nice, funny, and understanding, but , and unapproachability.

Format shift

Online evidence is very positive, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment , and assignments, with exams carrying major risk.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes labs, while , and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

concerns about heavy lectures, lots of work, vague study guides, and tough or specific grading.

Main concern

Students may face , and an unapproachable classroom tone.

What students said

“ .”
BIO134
“Study guides are vague, and .”
BIO134
“assigns way too much work and makes things more tedious than they have to be.”
BIO110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The only online review is very positive, saying the class taught a lot and .

Main concern

Online evidence is too .

What students said

“I learned a lot in his class,especially in the labs.”
BIO110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews support some student-friendly exam aids, but and vague alignment make the .

Notes AllowedStudent Discussion AllowedVague Study GuidesTough Exams

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly mention notes and limited student discussion during exams, but also warn that and study guides may not match.

Notes AllowedStudent Discussion AllowedVague Study GuidesTough Exams
“he'll let us use our notes and talk to students every last 15 minutes but for the final 45.”
BIO110
“Study guides are vague, and .”
BIO134
“ .”
BIOSC110

Online

The online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if possible but he's not a bad choice.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“The professor was actually really nice and funny.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“assigns way too much work and makes things more tedious than they have to be.”

🧪

62/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • The class was heavy on lecture, especially only once a week.
  • Everything needs to be hand-written so .
  • His write ups are redundant and tedious.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams and Grades

  • Study guides are vague, and .
  • .
  • If your goal is to just pass this class, even if you average a 50% on the , but do well on all the .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Classroom Experience

  • He talks down to students and relies on sarcasm.
  • and flexible with students you will overall be fine.
  • Gives sarcastic remarks when asking questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide meaningful but limited evidence, with only one online review and mixed opinions across several years.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO1103 reviews
BIO1343 reviews
BIOSC1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1