AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hyang-sug Lee

MATH118 · MATH120 · MATH164 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
43.75%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Only take her if , and a teaching style that students find highly polarizing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizingHeavy homeworkTest heavyStrict policiesStep-by-step help
  • and patience, while others describe disorganization and harsh policies.
  • Online reviews are much more negative, especially , and strict late rules.
  • Success seems possible for students who keep up, attend, ask questions, and tolerate a heavy math workload.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Passing and strong grades are possible, but students repeatedly say you must keep up with , and asking questions.

and riskier A because of technical and policy issues, while in-person evidence shows effort can be rewarded.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Math content is often described as fast-paced, concept-heavy, and packed with , and exams.

Online reviews emphasize rushed pacing and confusing organization, while but still challenging material.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Tags and comments warn that skipping class hurts performance, and and strict classroom control.

Both formats imply regular participation is important, with stricter .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

44/100

Recommendations are split because some students value her detailed help, while many warn against her strictness, workload, and disorganization.

, while in-person reviews are more balanced and include several strong recommendations.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, and technical-grade complaints point to strict grading.

Format shift

Online grading concerns are severe around late work and technical issues, while in-person reviews show some makeups and but .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and test pressure.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy workload, with online and quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Her teaching is polarizing, with praise for patience and step-by-step explanations offset by complaints about disorganization, fast pacing, and poor flexibility.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are mostly negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, midterms, finals, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with online reviews adding frequent quiz complaints and and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but more positive, with several students , and willingness to help.

Main concern

Students still report fast lectures, , and .

What students said

“Lectures went by fast, and my whole .”
MATH164
“She properly breaks apart the work for you and and formulas.”
MATH120
“she gives a lot of assignments but ”
MATH164

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing disorganization, technical problems, lots of , and .

Main concern

Students report strict technical and late-work handling that can damage grades.

What students said

“DO NOT and .”
MATH120
“There is lots of and the lectures are lengthy.”
MATH120
“I sacrificed so much for this class during this pandemic while working 2 jobs, yet because of technical difficulties.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and test-heavy, with , and serious online technical-risk complaints.

Test HeavyQuizzesMidterms And FinalsNo Quiz MakeupsTechnical Software Issues

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterms, finals, and no quiz makeups, but they do not clearly prove open-book or closed-book status.

Test HeavyMidterms And FinalsNo Quiz MakeupsFirst Exam Failure
“She will let you make up hw or ICAs but won't .”
MATH164
“Lectures went by fast, and my whole .”
MATH164
“As long as you and .”
MATH120

Online

Online , and technical problems, but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book status.

Test HeavyQuizzesFinal Technical IssuesSoftware Requirement Not Clearly Named
“I tried to fix the software she requires for 9 hours”
MATH120
“If your fault and problem”
MATH120
“There is lots of and the lectures are lengthy.”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Keep up, ask questions and you will pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She properly breaks apart the work for you and and formulas.”

⚠️ Online Risk

25/100

“DO NOT and .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“There is lots of and the lectures are lengthy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She properly breaks apart the work for you and and formulas.
  • She's really good at teaching step by step and going in a good pace for students.
  • Prof. Lee spent half of the 6-week course teaching basic concepts and review, then crammed new and harder concepts into the last 3 weeks without giving enough time for students to learn the material.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Attend class and do all your work and youll get a passing grade.
  • There is lots of and the lectures are lengthy.
  • Lectures went by fast, and my whole .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Policies & Flexibility

  • she didn't let me turn anything in.
  • She will let you make up hw or ICAs but won't .
  • Dont be late even if its her fault.

Theme 4

💻 About Online Experience

  • her incompetence shows.
  • I tried to fix the software she requires for 9 hours
  • Shes so disorganized, and blames her students for her faults.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across online and workload, strict policies, and polarized teaching.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH12011 reviews
MATH1643 reviews
MATH1182 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1