AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carol Stanton

CALC191 · MATH200 · CALC3 · MATH121 · MATH185 · MATH191 · MATH171 · MATH292 · MATH190 · MATH135 · MATH290 · 73 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
74.42%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you want a caring math teacher and and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsFunny and caringExtra credit and curvesSlow gradingWorkload varies
  • Stanton is widely praised for making difficult math clearer and more enjoyable.
  • Grades are often , but students still need steady effort.
  • The biggest recurring problem is delayed grading, especially in online courses.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Getting an A is realistic because she often , but math homework and tests still require effort.

and but more grading uncertainty, while in-person evidence shows fair exams and clearer support.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The math content is often difficult, but , and examples make it more manageable.

Online courses can feel harder when support is weak, while as clear and approachable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but several reviews say class participation and lectures matter for passing.

In-person reviews mention participation and lecture value more often, while online reviews focus more on watching lectures and meeting deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend her because , and strong at .

, while online recommendations are more divided because of and organization problems.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students report credit, and exam notes, though some call her a tough grader.

Format shift

Online grading can be delayed and inconsistent, while as fair or helpful.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload ranges from manageable to homework-heavy depending on the course, with repeated mentions of tests, quizzes, and assignments.

Format shift

Online reviews mention long problem sets and , while as useful but sometimes heavy.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly , and able to make hard math understandable.

Format shift

In-person teaching is consistently praised, while online teaching has stronger complaints about structure and .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Grades , and assignments, with some courses described as test-heavy.

Format shift

Online reviews mention tests, quizzes, homework, and assignments, while and practice.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, , and fair exams with some homework-heavy courses.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and doable if you chime in on her lectures. A .”
MATH200
“One of the most interesting math classes at CCC. and she tells you exactly what will be on the test.”
MATH185
“Tests are real HARD but as long as .”
MATH171

Remote format

Online

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with strong praise for clear and funny teaching but and weaker course management.

Main concern

and limited support can make progress hard to judge.

What students said

“Really frustrating in that regard but she IS an amazing teacher no question.”
MATH191
“Professor Stanton did not get around to grading ~70% of !”
MATH290
“It is very easy to get an A in her class as long as you watch the lectures and turn in things on time.”
MATH290

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is generally student-friendly, with , and curves mentioned across reviews.

Take-Home TestsGroup QuizzesExtra CreditCurvesOne Page Notes

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

81/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes, practice-like exams, and curves, but do not clearly prove closed-book or strict proctoring rules.

Take-Home ExamGroup QuizzesOne Page NotesPractice-Like ExamsCurves
“ within groups, and she was a .”
MATH121
“she allows a one page note for the exams.”
MATH292
“Our 3rd exam worth 20% of grade was a :).”
MATH190

Online

Online reviews explicitly , and exams based on lecture content, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Take-Home TestsEasy ExamsExtra CreditLecture-Based Tests
“Her tests and and .”
MATH290
“ and doable in a few minutes.”
MATH190
“ .”
MATH190

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you hate math Stanton will make you like it, and if you already like math she'll make you like it even more.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Her simplistic teaching style allows us to untangle complex ideas such as linear transformations in Linear Algebra.”

👍 Recommendation Level

86/100

“A .”

⚠️

45/100

“So up until the end of the semester - nobody in the class knew where they stood in the class or if they needed to improve on something.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches hard subjects, but as a teacher she is easy going and fun to work with.
  • and will make sure the whole class understand before moving on.
  • Clear lectures, straightforward exams, wry humor, truly appreciates the bizarre beauty of math and you will too by the end of any class with Ms Stanton.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is very easy to get an A in her class as long as you watch the lectures and turn in things on time.
  • but she grades very fairly.
  • Lots of is offered in this class.

Theme 3

⏳ About Organization

  • Professor Stanton did not get around to grading ~70% of !
  • Only room for , but other than that a great professor overall.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

73

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews span many years and courses, with consistent praise for teaching and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 553
4 out of 56
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1919 reviews
MATH2908 reviews
MATH2928 reviews
MATH1907 reviews
MATH1855 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1714 reviews
MATH1213 reviews
CALC1912 reviews
2901 review
CALC31 review
MATH1351 review
MATH2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 3 · A 16

B range

12

B+ 4 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

4

C 3 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather_Not_Say 1