Mera Horne

ENGIN200 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 29/100
RMP rating: 2.7/5
Take again: 33.33%
Difficulty: 3.3

The decision

if you are comfortable learning independently and can handle inconsistent support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching requiredLecture heavyMixed grading leniencyWeak communication

Students report a split experience, with one strong positive review but two strongly negative signals.
Getting an A appears possible, but it may require self-teaching and tolerance for .
All evidence comes from online ENGIN-200 reviews, so .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Two students earned A grades, but , and effort rather than an easy path.

All evidence is from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course has lots of material and lecture-heavy delivery, but one student says the .

Only online reviews exist, so course difficulty reflects the online ENGIN-200 experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Avoid

30/100

The overall tone is risky because two reviews describe major dissatisfaction despite one positive experience.

The recommendation judgment is based only on online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

64/100

, and an easy-grader comment suggest some grading flexibility despite unclear experiences.

Format shift

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and lots of material suggest a manageable but not light workload.

Format shift

and material load, with no in-person comparison.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Students cite self-teaching and minimal communication, outweighing the and email replies.

Format shift

The poor teaching signal comes only from online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention homework, exercises, participation, and and exams.

Format shift

Only online reviews describe the assessment mix.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a lecture-heavy course with mixed experiences, ranging from prompt email responses .

Main concern

and communication are not enough.

What students said

“I earned an A in this course, but it required significant self-teaching.”
ENGIN-200

“Run as fast as you can”
ENGIN-200

“Lots of material but .”
ENGIN-200

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but do not clearly prove the exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, or .

Unclear Exam QuestionExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Unclear Exam QuestionPolicy Not Clearly Proven

“ ”
ENGIN-200

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“I earned an A in this course, but it required significant self-teaching.”
Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“I earned an A in this course, but it required significant self-teaching.”

⚖️

64/100

“ was added late due to class failing.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“Run as fast as you can”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Communication outside weekly lectures was minimal.
Pre-recorded lectures + weekly lecture and exercises.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

I earned an A in this course, but it required significant self-teaching.
Lots of material but .
and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are recent and include specific details with sharply mixed sentiment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGIN-2003 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

A 2

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1

Mera Horne

x x x x if you are comfortable learning independently and can handle inconsistent support.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Standard

Recommended

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

👍 Recommendation Risk

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you are comfortable learning independently and can handle inconsistent support.

⚖️