AI Rate Professor

Business

Sabina Crocette

RE161 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

This professor is a gamble because the grade outcomes look strong but student experience varies sharply by format.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized reviewsFair graderUnderstandingLow difficultyLimited evidence
  • The two reviews completely conflict, with one calling the class horrible and the other praising her support.
  • Both reported grades are A-range, so high grades appear possible despite mixed satisfaction.
  • Evidence is too thin to make a strong recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Both reviewers earned A-range grades, but the online review still describes doing sincere assignment work rather than getting a free A.

Online evidence suggests fair effort for an A, while + but .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The low difficulty ratings and A-range outcomes suggest manageable content, though comments provide little detail on course challenge.

Both formats appear manageable, but only the .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Neither online nor in-person evidence clearly supports an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Recommendation is split because one student strongly warns against the class while another praises the instructor as fair and understanding.

Online evidence is positive, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Both recorded grades are A-range, and the online student explicitly calls her a .

Format shift

, while + but no details.

Workload

Light

75/100

Difficulty ratings are low to moderate and no review reports heavy workload.

Format shift

No format provides detailed workload evidence, but both grade outcomes suggest the class is manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching experience is highly polarized, with one harsh negative in-person review and one very positive online review.

Format shift

Online teaching is described as supportive, while but vague.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The only detailed review emphasizes assignments and lectures, with .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions assignments, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The but gives almost no detail.

Main concern

The .

What students said

“Horrible! ”
RE-161

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review is very positive and describes her as understanding, communicative, and fair.

Main concern

Only one online review supports this positive view.

What students said

“I can communicate well with my instructor if needed and .”
RE-161
“I feel she is a .”
RE-161

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, quizzes, midterms, or finals.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I feel she is a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting the sharp split between support and dissatisfaction. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

78/100

“I feel she is a .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“I can communicate well with my instructor if needed and .”

⚠️ Recommendation Split

50/100

“Horrible! ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Support

  • I can communicate well with my instructor if needed and .
  • I feel she is a .

Theme 2

⚠️ About Mixed Experience

  • Horrible!
  • I was skeptical about taking her class as I am a very nervous student, however, .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews exist, they are sharply contradictory, and one gives almost no detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

RE-1612 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values