AI Rate Professor

English

Jeffrey Smith

ENGLISH001C · ENG1A · ENGL1C · 142B · ENG2B · ENG1B · ENG1C · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you want a supportive writing teacher and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardVery HelpfulCaringClear FeedbackTough GraderAccessible Outside Class
  • as caring, available, and strong at improving student writing.
  • Older and online reviews report serious problems with , and .
  • Students benefit most and revise their writing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and rewrites help, but and essays require real effort.

In-person evidence shows effort can pay off, while and failed-course complaints.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The material is manageable English writing and reading, but , and high standards keep it from feeling easy.

In-person reviews describe standard but demanding writing work, while online reviews focus more on course management problems than content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Attendance and participation matter in some in-person reviews, but .

; online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and support, though online complaints and tough grading create real risk.

, while online students are much more divided and often negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

He is often described as a , but many students say , and help make grades fair.

Format shift

In-person reviews describe tough but , while online reviews include harsher complaints about grade handling.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The , and revisions rather than constant busywork.

Format shift

and papers often, while online reviews mention papers and .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most students , and ability to improve writing despite some off-topic lectures and online failures.

Format shift

teaching, where several students report poor access and communication.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment appears mainly based on essays, papers, revisions, homework, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize written work, while and final in-class essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are , and strong writing improvement.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“If you really want to improve your writing this is the professor you need.”
ENG1A
“ , but not easy!!!”
ENG1A

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with one positive review but several complaints about poor communication and .

Main concern

Students may struggle to get timely responses or grades online.

What students said

“Professor Smith is really horrible with online learning!”
ENG1B
“He has not too many assignments, a couple opportunities, and great when it came to communication.”
ENGLISH001C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews give limited exam-policy evidence, with and final in-class essay.

In-Class Essay MidtermIn-Class Essay FinalExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

One in-person review mentions a midterm in-class essay and a final in-class essay, but .

In-Class Essay MidtermIn-Class Essay Final
“3 papers midterm in class essay and .”
ENG1A

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you really want to improve your writing this is the professor you need.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“This is the . and he helps all his students be successful”

⚖️

45/100

“He's a .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made me understand English so much and with writing essays .
  • and would help you to improve your writing skills.
  • Lecture heavy but the and inspiration.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !
  • , but not easy!!!
  • As log as you pay attention and .

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • .
  • He cares about all of his students and wants everyone to be successful
  • Show him that you're putting in effort and he'll do his hardest to help you out during his office hours or even immediately after class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 38 reviews across many years, with consistent praise for support and and online communication.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527
4 out of 53
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENG1A18 reviews
ENG2B9 reviews
ENG1C5 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
ENGL1C2 reviews
Show 2 more courses
142B1 review
ENGLISH001C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 5

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

13

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 8