AI Rate Professor

Art

Anthony Gordon

ART117 · ART224 · ART124 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
75/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want detailed feedback and , and sometimes strict grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear FeedbackTough GraderCaringPassionate About ArtNot Beginner Friendly
  • , and engaging teaching.
  • not meet his exact expectations.
  • Online reviews are more mixed, with one strong complaint about communication and strictness.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Many students earned A grades, but comments repeatedly say he is a and expects careful work.

Online reviews show stricter grading concerns, while reachable.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course is not low-effort and may be hard for beginners without drawing or painting background.

Online ART124 is described as less beginner-friendly, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Participation matters appears in several tags, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention participation more often, while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and engaging teaching, but and one negative online experience lower confidence.

, while online recommendations are more divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

46/100

and feedback, but several reviews call him a .

Format shift

Online reviews include the , while as manageable with help.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Assignments require real effort, and one online tag reports lots of homework, but deadlines can be reasonable.

Format shift

Online workload feels heavier due to supplies and assignments, while as structured.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most , and passion, despite one strong complaint about rude communication.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is split between excellent and poor experiences.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

, and art projects, suggesting a mix of work types.

Format shift

and essays, while online reviews focus more on assignments and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive, , and transparent test expectations.

Main concern

Some students still find essays and .

What students said

“Overall, he's a good, fun teacher who's passionate about art.”
ART-224
“he can be a ”
ART117
“ ! He's super transparent with what he expects you to learn for the tests.”
ART117

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with strong praise for lectures and support but concerns about beginner difficulty, expensive supplies, and .

Main concern

Online students may need prior art skills and must follow instructions closely.

What students said

“Prof Gordon is fantastic.”
ART117
“This class is not an ideal class for beginner's.”
ART124
“He is quite a , but if successful.”
ART117

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence says tests are moderate and allow one page of notes, while .

One Page of Notes AllowedModerate TestsExam Policy Partly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

take good notes and one page of notes is allowed.

One Page of Notes AllowedModerate Tests
“ as long as you have good notes for the he allows one page of notes on his exams.”
ART117

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far one of the best professors in Contra Costa College. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting teaching, grading, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Prof Gordon is fantastic.”

⚖️

46/100

“He is quite a , but if successful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

74/100

“ ! He's super transparent with what he expects you to learn for the tests.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and .
  • Overall, he's a good, fun teacher who's passionate about art.
  • Art , yet professor Gordon made art appreciation very intriguing to all of his students.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He often says that people expect his classes to be easy and low-effort, but that's not the case.
  • He is quite a , but if successful.
  • he can be a

Theme 3

💬

  • !
  • and so you'll know EXACTLY what you need to fix in order to get a better grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across online and , though some are older and experiences vary.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1176 reviews
ART1242 reviews
ART-2241 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 6

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values