AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Jessica Le

MEDIC236 · MED150 · MEDIC208 · MEDIC221 · MEDI221 · MEDIC150 · MEDIC205 · MEDIC200 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
79/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if and weekly work, especially in person where reviews are much stronger.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleHeavy weekly readingClear grading criteriaMixed online teachingExtra credit support
  • Students often praise Jessica Le as , and invested in student success.
  • Online reviews are more divided because several students felt the course relied too much on third-party materials and self-teaching.
  • The workload is steady and reading-heavy, but many students still earned strong grades when they stayed on top of assignments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic for organized students, but the , and summaries make it more than an easy pass.

Online evidence shows more self-paced workload, while , and participation.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is manageable but not light because students repeatedly mention , and repetitive medical terminology work.

, while in-person reviews describe harder material that becomes manageable with attention and questions.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but in-person students strongly imply that going to class matters for success.

Online sections are more asynchronous or work-ahead, while and paying attention.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and helpful, but online complaints about third-party reliance reduce confidence.

In-person reviews are strongly favorable, while online and frustration with limited direct teaching.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

67/100

Grades look attainable and appears in some in-person reviews, but the workload and one .

Format shift

Online grading is often handled through third-party systems, while as clearer and occasionally supported by .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of reading, homework, papers, summaries, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize weekly self-taught work and third-party assignments, while , and labs.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

She is often described as , and helpful, but several online and directly.

Format shift

, while online feedback is divided by how well students handle independent learning.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews focus , and third-party assignments than on exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments, with online work routed through external sites and , and labs.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly positive, emphasizing , and despite some difficult material.

Main concern

The main concern is that some students felt lab or clinic preparation was incomplete.

What students said

“She is a good teacher and .”
MEDIC208
“go to class and pay attention and you will be good.”
MED150
“She doesnt teach any skills in the future.”
MEDIC221

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experiences are mixed, with some students praising organization and access while others complain about third-party systems and self-teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is heavy independent work with limited direct teaching in some online sections.

What students said

“ , so not much teacher interaction.”
MEDIC200
“She expects you to put work in weekly, but it's all laid out for you and you can work ahead.”
MEDIC236
“This professor does absolutely nothing literally everything is handled by third party external sites from the exercises, tests and grading.”
MEDIC150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention third-party online tests but do not clearly prove webcam rules, proctoring, open-book status, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatThird-party online tests mentionedAssignment-heavy grading

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

No clear in-person exam evidence

Online

Online reviews mention third-party exercises, tests, and grading, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Third-party tests mentionedNo clear proctoring evidenceNo clear open-book evidence
“everything is handled by third party external sites from the exercises, tests and grading.”
MEDIC150

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She expects you to put work in weekly, but it's all laid out for you and you can work ahead.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, format differences, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is a good teacher and .”

📚 Workload Reality

34/100

“STAY ON TOP OF YOUR WORK!!”

👍 Recommendation Signal

72/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a good teacher and .
  • and
  • Professor Le managed to make her personality show through in an online class

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • You have to read a long chapter every week and write a short chapter summary about it.
  • a lot of work and
  • The material is overly excessive and extremely repetitive and drab.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and helps us reach our goals.
  • Professor Le cares about students and what is going on with us.
  • she was always there to make sure I understood the topics we .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 11 reviews span several years, include both formats, and give consistent detail about workload, teaching style, and grading.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MED1502 reviews
MEDIC1502 reviews
MEDIC2212 reviews
MEDI2211 review
MEDIC2001 review
Show 3 more courses
medic2051 review
MEDIC2081 review
MEDIC2361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1