AI Rate Professor

English

Nooshi Borhan

ESL169 · ESL186 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a highly supportive ESL professor and are willing to keep up with .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear explanationsCaring and helpfulHeavy homeworkOrganized classHighly recommended
  • Every review is positive and describes Nooshi Borhan as , and effective.
  • The class has frequent homework, but students say the workload produces real learning.
  • Evidence is fully in person, so no online experience should be inferred.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Good grades are achievable with effort, but students repeatedly say there is always or a lot of homework.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The because and helps struggling students, even when the workload is steady.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Reviews do not state a , but they emphasize productive in-class teaching and learning.

Only in-person reviews exist, and none clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and effective for ESL success.

Recommendation evidence is entirely from in-person students and is consistently positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Available grades and comments suggest fair outcomes, but and .

Format shift

, and it does not mention curves, , or harsh grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is not light because multiple students mention .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Every review praises her teaching, organization, clarity, helpfulness, or effectiveness.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person, with no online reviews to compare.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention homework and Canvas assignments but as a .

Format shift

, and there is no online assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students consistently , and strong learning outcomes despite lots of homework.

Main concern

The main concern is a steady and .

What students said

“She's an amazing teacher. .”
ESL169
“She gives a lot of homework. But you learn a lot.”
ESL169
“ success.”
ESL169

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly describe exam .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rules, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

No clear in-person exam evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She gives a lot of homework. But you learn a lot.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“She's an amazing teacher. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ success.”

📚 Workload Balance

48/100

“ and as well.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's an amazing teacher. .
  • she is so good teaching, she's not wasting time in class.
  • She is the .

Theme 2

📚 and Learning

  • and as well.
  • She gives a lot of homework. But you learn a lot.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • and is willing to help you if you are struggling.
  • Nooshi is very hardworking and helpful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because all four reviews are strongly consistent, but the sample is small and two reviews are old.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL1693 reviews
ESL1861 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values