AI Rate Professor

English

Brandon Marshall

ENGL1A · ENGL2B · 1C · ENG2B · ENGL001C · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
93.75%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Marshall if you want an engaging and writing are rewarded with strong support and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring MentorClear FeedbackReading HeavyThought ProvokingLenient Grading
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his caring, engaging, and .
  • The class often requires reading, writing, and participation, but as fair or lenient.
  • Online reviews are positive too, though one reports a rough late-semester workload spike.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very realistic with and writing because grading is often lenient, rewrites and appear, and many students report A grades.

Both formats support strong grades, but online evidence includes one late-semester workload spike while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The course is not conceptually effortless because students , and participation.

Online and , but in-person reviews more strongly emphasize deep thinking and reading discipline.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

62/100

Participation matters, but the reviews do not clearly prove a .

Both online and in-person reviews mention participation, but neither format clearly proves a .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and .

Both formats are strongly positive, though the in-person evidence is larger and more consistent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students mention , and not being a harsh grader.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the clearest grading-leniency evidence, while and slight .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is steady with reading, annotations, essays, and discussions, but most students find it manageable if they keep up.

Format shift

Online reviews include one rough end-of-semester spike, while and writing across the term.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students repeatedly describe his lectures as , and intellectually meaningful.

Format shift

Both online and in-person students praise his teaching, with stronger volume and consistency in in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment appears driven mainly , and written work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats mainly discuss assignments and writing, not exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students consistently describe him as , and fair, with meaningful reading and writing.

Main concern

Students must keep up with readings, essays, and participation.

What students said

“ but not much, and a .”
ENGL001C
“He accepts late work and gives .”
ENG2B
“As long as, you keep up with the out with an A!”
ENGL2B

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students praise clear rubrics, interesting topics, and , but one review warns of a .

Main concern

Reading and writing can pile up near the end of the term.

What students said

“His feedbacks are straight to the point and helped me realized what I needed to do with a .”
ENGL001C
“Gives great criteria on work and manages to help you improve.”
ENGL1A
“it was super rough & inconvenient with the .”
ENGL001C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and essays, but do not clearly prove exam policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews discuss readings, essays, assignments, rubrics, and feedback, but .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Marshall truly cares about the success of his students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Lectures are easy to follow along, clear instructions, great communication with all students, makes sure you fully understand main objective, lectures are not boring, and creates great learning environment.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ . MARSHALL.”

⚖️

82/100

“He accepts late work and gives .”

📚 Workload Reality

55/100

“Be prepared to do a lot of writing”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Marshall truly cares about the success of his students.
  • He genuinely cares for all his students.
  • He's more like a mentor and a really good friend.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He isn't a , and lets you rewrite when you get a low grade on a homework.
  • As long as, you keep up with the out with an A!
  • Definitely need to earn your grade and the class is only fun if everyone does the reading.

Theme 3

📚

  • There is a good amount of reading and annotations.
  • Be prepared to do a lot of writing
  • it was super rough & inconvenient with the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews across several years are detailed, consistent, and include both online and in-person experiences.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGL001C8 reviews
ENG2B4 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
1C1 review
ENGL2B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 4 · A 7

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1