AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Aminta Mickles

HHS226 · HHS222 · HHS1438 · HHS115 · HHS223 · HHS228 · PSYCH220 · HHS224 · 79 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.9/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a and helps students connect the material to real life.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational mentorCaring and supportiveParticipation focusedClear expectationsCareer-relevant learning
  • Students overwhelmingly describe her as caring, inspirational, professional, and deeply invested in their success.
  • Her classes emphasize participation, discussion, real-world examples, and career preparation.
  • Grades appear very achievable for engaged students, though participation and class involvement matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Many students report A grades and , but participation and .

Both formats look grade-friendly for engaged students, with and in-person reviews emphasizing participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Students say , and makes the material meaningful, even when the course requires engagement.

Online reviews praise Zoom explanations and guidance, while , and applied learning.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Participation is repeatedly emphasized, and some in-person comments say learning opportunities cannot be missed.

Online reviews say participation is expected, while class activities.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students almost universally recommend her because , and career-focused.

Both online and in-person reviews are strongly positive, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

High grades are common and students mention , and balanced expectations, though .

Format shift

Both formats support fair and achievable grading, while work.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Workload appears manageable and meaningful, with participation, reading, assignments, and class activities rather than overwhelming busywork.

Format shift

Online reviews describe clear weekly support, while , and learning opportunities.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Reviews consistently describe her as , and highly effective.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats, with online students valuing support and in-person students emphasizing life-changing class experiences.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments point more to assignments, participation, group work, discussions, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats emphasize participation and assignments, and neither format gives strong evidence of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely enthusiastic, with students praising her inspiration, care, professionalism, and career preparation.

Main concern

Several reviews mention participation, group assignments, reading, or learning opportunities that students should not miss.

What students said

“This was a truly life-changing and personally rewarding course.”
HHS224
“Professor Mickles cares about her students, not only in an academic way, but in a personal way.”
HHS223
“A lot of in class group assignments/discussions. Expect Learning Opps. and cant miss them at all.”
HHS1438

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online reviews are highly positive and , and useful real-world examples.

Main concern

Participation is expected, so fully passive students may not get the same value.

What students said

“Participation is expected.”
PSYCH220
“professor Mickles was on Zoom every week, to discuss material and answer questions.”
PSYCH220
“this was the perfect class with a great professor.”
PSYCH220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or , and only limited quiz evidence appears.

Quizzes MentionedParticipation-Based Activities

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and class activities, but they do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book status, midterm format, or .

Quizzes MentionedIn-Class Activities
“ ”
HHS115
“A lot of in class group assignments/discussions. Expect Learning Opps. and cant miss them at all.”
HHS1438

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Mickles cares about her students, not only in an academic way, but in a personal way. She will go out of her way to help you learn and help you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“The professor made every class engaging, informative, and meaningful.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

99/100

“I .”

📈 Grade Friendliness

84/100

“Make an effort to talk sometimes, ask questions if .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She brings real-world examples which is needed to be successful.
  • She went over the book weekly via Zoom which help understand the reading.
  • Professor mickles is an amazing teacher she teaches us to think outside the box and invokes our minds with her lessons

Theme 2

❤️ About Support And Character

  • One of the !
  • She is very understanding. Don't be afraid to admit if .
  • The professor really puts her heart and soul into her work.

Theme 3

📚 About Participation And Work

  • Participation is expected.
  • A lot of in class group assignments/discussions. Expect Learning Opps. and cant miss them at all.
  • and I learned a lot in her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

79

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years, multiple courses, and both formats with highly consistent positive sentiment.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 571
4 out of 510
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HHS22316 reviews
HHS143813 reviews
PSYCH2207 reviews
HHS2286 reviews
HHS1154 reviews
Show 3 more courses
HHS2222 reviews
HHS2241 review
HHS2261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

10

Not sure yet 10