AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Marisa Greenberg

KINES201 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

unless and little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized Online CourseBroken Assignment LinksTest HeavyLow Support
  • The only review describes a and broken submission links.
  • The student earned an A, but the experience was frustrating and unsupported.
  • There is no in-person evidence, so all conclusions come from one online review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

The student earned an A, but the review does not show that the A was effortless because the course was test heavy and .

Evidence comes only from one online review, with no in-person comparison.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content itself is not described as hard, but broken setup and .

Only online evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, and the online format suggests flexibility without proving it.

Only online evidence exists, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

The review is strongly negative because the , and frustrating.

The recommendation judgment is based only on one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

The student received an A, but there is .

Format shift

Only one online review includes grade evidence, and there is .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The , but setup issues made the work harder to manage.

Format shift

Only online workload evidence exists.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

The review describes poor course management, broken links, and minimal support.

Format shift

Teaching quality evidence comes only from the online section.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The review tags the course as test heavy and specifically mentions quizzes.

Format shift

Assessment evidence comes only from the online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online course appears disorganized, with , and limited learning support.

Main concern

Course setup errors and weak guidance make the class frustrating.

What students said

“Dates for to answer for the syllabus quiz.”
KINES-201
“Conflicting information on modules and links to turn in .”
KINES-201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and a test-heavy structure, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Quiz HeavyExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The online review mentions quizzes but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

Quiz HeavyOnline Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Aside from the for.”
KINES-201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Conflicting information on modules and links to turn in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Conflicting information on modules and links to turn in .”

📚 Course Setup

25/100

“Dates for to answer for the syllabus quiz.”

🧪 Assessment Risk

45/100

“Aside from the for.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Course Organization

  • Dates for to answer for the syllabus quiz.
  • Conflicting information on modules and links to turn in .

Theme 2

📈 About Assessments

  • Aside from the for.
  • and the lectures are only audio files.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one review, though it gives specific online-course problems.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

KINES-2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values