AI Rate Professor

English

Gary Walker-Roberts

ENG1A · ENGL1A · ENL1A · ENGLISH1A · 1A · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
84.21%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a supportive but participatory writing class where effort and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring FeedbackWriting ImprovementParticipation HeavyStructured EssaysSome Tough Grading
  • Most students describe major improvement in writing and strong personal support.
  • The class rewards participation, drafts, office hours, and steady .
  • A small cluster of older in-person reviews , and topic focus.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

Good grades are common, but students repeatedly say you must do the work, participate, and .

Online reviews emphasize structured support and participation, while and some stricter MLA concerns.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The writing content is manageable with guidance, but , and formatting standards create real challenge.

Online students describe the first weeks as hard but improving, while as steady writing work.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Comments strongly suggest showing up and participating matter, even if a .

Online reviews mention being called on in discussions, while and show up on time.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because , and improves their writing.

Both formats are strongly positive overall, though the and older.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Grades are often strong and or makeup opportunities appear, but some students report strict MLA and .

Format shift

Online evidence shows clear criteria and , while and tougher grading complaints.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The , and participation, but most students find it manageable with effort.

Format shift

Online reviews stress participation and staged writing, while and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Most students describe him as caring, patient, detailed, and effective at improving writing despite a few strong negative reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews are uniformly positive, while older negative cluster.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on essays, drafts, presentations, research, and writing rules rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with only one online review clearly mentioning a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, care, and writing growth, but a few older reviews complain about grading and clarity.

Main concern

Some students dislike the participation demands and strict writing-format expectations.

What students said

“He is very patient with you and in.”
ENGLISH1A
“Just do the work and youll get a good grade.”
ENG1A
“Grades MLA format heavily but doesn't even know much about MLA.”
ENGL1A

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students praise his patience, portal support, staged writing process, and strong one-on-one help.

Main concern

Participation and early adjustment to the online structure can be demanding.

What students said

“Takes time to teach you how to be successful online.”
ENG1A
“The first few weeks were hard but gets easier.”
ENGL1A
“if you don't ”
1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while other exam policies are not clearly proven.

Timed In-Class Writing FinalPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, quiz format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

One online review mentions a timed in-class writing final, but reviews do not clearly .

Timed In-Class Writing FinalPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“The .”
1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Never had a professor care so much. Take the class. AMAZING!”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He is very patient with you and in.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“I wish he taught the next level !”

⚖️ Effort And Grades

70/100

“Just do the work and youll get a good grade.”

💻 Online Support

88/100

“Takes time to teach you how to be successful online.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very patient with you and in.
  • He makes writing fun and breaks it down so I understand how to write an essay.
  • He spent lots of time with me Zooming to make sure I understood everything.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you put in the work and participate -- you'll be fine.
  • Just do the work and youll get a good grade.
  • Grades MLA format heavily but doesn't even know much about MLA.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Character

  • Never had a professor care so much.
  • He totally wanted me to pass and helped me get caught up.
  • He is passionate and would stay after class for 30 minutes to help anyone.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews across online and enough detail to account for a smaller negative cluster.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

1A7 reviews
ENG1A7 reviews
ENGL1A2 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
ENL1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 4 · A 4 · A- 2

B range

4

B+ 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values