AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chris Wu

M1641642 · MATH200 · MATH164 · MATH120 · MATH135 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless and only need flexible grading logistics.

Best fit · Self Taught ProWeak lecturesLots of homeworkSelf-study requiredLenient deadlinesMyLab heavy
  • Most students say .
  • and can be heavy or hard.
  • A few students , and possible easy A outcomes despite poor teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some students report , and easy A potential, but and weak teaching make the A require self-study.

In-person evidence includes the clearest easy A claim, while online evidence stresses struggle but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

The courses feel hard because students , and reliance on tutoring or outside resources.

Both formats point to self-teaching, with online reviews especially focused on confusion and lack of response.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

64/100

Reviews do not prove strict attendance, and , and tardiness.

In-person reviews provide most flexibility evidence, while online reviews mention relaxed deadlines but .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because they feel he does not teach effectively and assigns difficult or .

Both formats lean negative, though a small number of students value his leniency and retakes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Despite tough courses, students mention , and lenient deadlines.

Format shift

In-person reviews give stronger evidence of , while and chill deadlines.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

as heavy, hard, daily or weekly, and sometimes a large share of the grade.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy homework, with in-person reviews specifically saying homework can be 70% of the grade.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most comments describe weak explanations, boring lectures, poor communication, or students needing outside resources.

Format shift

Online reviews criticize communication and textbook reliance, while and ineffective lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment appears , and tests rather than strong lecture-based evaluation.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize MyLab and , while and frequent tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative about teaching quality, though , and easy A potential.

Main concern

Lectures often do not help enough, and .

What students said

“If you want ”
MATH120
“ if you want an easy A.”
MATH135
“Homework takes up 70% of the whole grade.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed but lean negative, with confusion, weak communication, heavy homework, and .

Main concern

Students may need outside resources because online teaching and responsiveness are weak.

What students said

“Doesn't teach and you have to rely on the textbook which can be difficult.”
MATH200
“ learning.”
MATH120
“ if you arent happy with your grade.”
MATH120

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and online platforms, but and reopened exams make the policy more flexible than strict.

Retakes AvailableReopened ExamsWeekly TestsMyLab TestsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention MyLab tests, reopened exams, and , but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or strict proctoring.

MyLab TestsReopened ExamsHomework-Heavy Grade
“Homework and and hes very lenient about everything.”
MATH135
“If you miss an another 3 days or so.”
MATH135

Online

Online reviews mention weekly tests and retakes, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Weekly TestsRetakes AvailableNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“He assigns hw every week and ”
MATH120
“ if you arent happy with your grade.”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have other options for .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendations. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“Not really teaching things but and seems like talking to himself.”

📚 Workload Pressure

22/100

“Homework takes up 70% of the whole grade.”

⚖️

72/100

“If you miss an another 3 days or so.”

👍 Recommendation Level

28/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • If you want
  • Doesn't teach and you have to rely on the textbook which can be difficult.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Homework takes up 70% of the whole grade.
  • .
  • He's got a day.

Theme 3

🧩 About Flexibility

  • He's chill on deadlines and stuff like that.
  • if you arent happy with your grade.
  • and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 reviews across several years and formats, with consistent criticism but a smaller sample size.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1206 reviews
MATH1352 reviews
M164-16421 review
MATH1641 review
MATH2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1