AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Chao Liu

ENGIN170 · ENGIN230 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you want a supportive professor who makes difficult engineering material manageable with effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring professorAccessible outside classExtra creditHelpful for passingEffort rewarded
  • Students unanimously recommend him and all reported A grades.
  • The material can be hard, but , and .
  • , and using his support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is very reachable because all reviewers earned A grades and cite , but effort and .

, though one review describes taking an online Matlab class but is counted as in person by the supplied flag.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is not easy because students call Matlab and engineering fundamentals hard, but his support makes it manageable.

All format-authoritative evidence is in person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

One review says skipping class means you will not pass, and the comments stress homework and active help-seeking.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and helps motivated students pass.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

and strong student support make grades forgiving for students who try.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework and fundamentals matter, but the workload sounds manageable with support.

Format shift

Workload evidence is only in person.

Teaching experience

Excellent

95/100

Students , and willing to work through problems.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and rather than one dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Assessment evidence is only in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews describe him as , and generous with help and .

Main concern

The , and asking for help.

What students said

“ and is willing to work with you through problems.”
ENGIN170
“he helped me pass with an A!”
ENGIN170
“Doing the , if you can understand the hw then you will be fine.”
ENGIN230

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, midterm, or .

Extra Credit On Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam format or .

Extra Credit On Tests
“There are also .”
ENGIN230

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“great professor, very caring and he will help you pass if you ask questions. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting support, grades, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

95/100

“ and is willing to work with you through problems.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“def reccomend this prof”

📈 Effort And Grades

82/100

“he helped me pass with an A!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was so helpful and caring.
  • and is willing to work with you through problems.
  • This professor cares for his students and will help you pass if you put in the effort.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • It is matlab, so some parts will be hard
  • There are also .
  • Doing the , if you can understand the hw then you will be fine.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed, consistent, and all strongly positive.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGIN1702 reviews
ENGIN2301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values