AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Thomas Phipps

CIT1122 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you can handle many hours of and strict syllabus enforcement.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerOverwhelming HomeworkRigid PoliciesUnsupportiveTime ConsumingStrict Deadlines
  • The only review describes an .
  • The student reports little flexibility when asking for an extension.
  • Teaching experience is judged poorly because the main complaint is lack of support and empathy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

An A appears very hard because the workload is enormous and the professor is described as unwilling to offer flexibility.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

The course seems intellectually and practically demanding because and are assigned in large numbers.

All course-difficulty ; no online evidence exists.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

The review does not clearly state attendance rules, but it .

Only an in-person review exists, and it does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The because the and the professor seems inflexible.

All recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

20/100

The review , but the strict extension response suggests low flexibility around coursework.

Format shift

, so confidence is limited.

Workload

Overwhelming

5/100

The workload is described as several hours of each class.

Format shift

All workload , and it is strongly negative.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

The student describes the professor as unwilling to help when a .

Format shift

All teaching-experience ; there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

10/100

The review and packet tracer assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The in-person review is very and rigid handling of an .

Main concern

The workload may become overwhelming, and flexibility appears limited.

What students said

“Get ready to .”
CIT1122
“he just echoed the syllabus to me.”
CIT1122

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The review does not clearly prove any exam format, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy and mainly discusses homework assignments.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get ready to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in workload and flexibility. Credibility rating: Low.

📚 Workload Intensity

5/100

“Packet tracers worth 2-5 hours each, if you're doing them legitimately.”

🎯 Teaching Support

5/100

“The biggest negative about him was his unwillingness to act like a human being with me.”

⚖️ Flexibility

20/100

“I asked for an because something came up, and he just echoed the syllabus to me.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Get ready to .
  • Packet tracers worth 2-5 hours each, if you're doing them legitimately.
  • 5 or more assigned after each class.

Theme 2

🧑‍🏫 About Support

  • The biggest negative about him was his unwillingness to act like a human being with me.
  • he just echoed the syllabus to me.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, so the evidence is detailed but too limited for high confidence.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CIT11221 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1