AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Latha Gopinath

MATH118 · MATH120 · STATS200 · MATH13 · MATH190 · MATH111 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
19/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesFast PacedHeavy HomeworkTough GraderPoor Feedback
  • Most students criticize the teaching as , and frustrating.
  • Students report , and little grade transparency.
  • A small minority says she can help serious students, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

and persistence, with frequent complaints about tough grading and .

Online reviews emphasize delayed grading and no study guides, while and fast lectures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The math content feels harder because students say lectures are fast, vague, and often require self-teaching.

Both formats describe difficulty, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and participation matter, and missing class makes it hard to keep up.

Both formats include skip-class warnings, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend her because they find the , and support frustrating.

Both online and few in-person positive exceptions.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students cite tough grading, no , and .

Format shift

Online reviews stress delayed grading, while and poor grade transparency.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews repeatedly mention lots of homework, class work, studying, and fast coverage of material.

Format shift

Heavy workload appears in both formats, with more repeated evidence in in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Most comments describe unclear explanations, frustration with questions, fast pacing, and .

Format shift

Both formats are negative, though a few in-person reviews say she helps students who work hard.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and test feedback problems more than projects.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews mostly describe vague, fast lectures, strict expectations, heavy work, and .

Main concern

The and fast pacing.

What students said

“ and gets argumentative if you ask a question for .”
MATH118
“She goes through the material extremely fast and not very clearly.”
STATS200
“She does not give back your tests until the end of the semester.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing poor engagement, frustration, no study guides, and .

Main concern

The main concern is having to self-teach with little useful guidance or feedback.

What students said

“She doesn't grade a single thing until after the semester is over.”
MATH120
“She also does not give study guides for .”
MATH120
“if you ask her something she'll just tell you to read the text.”
MATH13

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because reviews mention no study guides, , and strict test conditions in person.

No Study GuidesNo Extra CreditNo Notes On Tests MentionedDelayed Test Feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, tests, no notes, no calculators in one class, no , and delayed test returns.

No Notes On TestsNo Calculators MentionedNo Extra CreditDelayed Test Feedback
“Oh yeah no .”
MATH118
“She doesn't let you .”
MATH120
“No provided.”
MATH120

Online

Online reviews mention tests and no study guides, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

No Study GuidesTests Mentioned
“She also does not give study guides for .”
MATH120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just save yourself the struggle and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

Teaching Quality

24/100

“She is not very good at explaining the material and if you ask her something she'll just tell you to read the text.”

Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

22/100

“Your grade? she guesses what she thinks it might be instead of having everything in a grade book.”

Theme 1

Teaching Style

  • and gets argumentative if you ask a question for .
  • She goes through the material extremely fast and not very clearly.
  • Her answer for everything is 'read the text,' she gets annoyed when questions are asked or comments are made.

Theme 2

Grades and Feedback

  • She doesn't grade a single thing until after the semester is over.
  • She does not give back your tests until the end of the semester, so you do not know your grade until you have completed the class.
  • Don't expect .

Theme 3

Workload and Exams

  • gives out a lot of homework.
  • She also does not give study guides for .
  • Oh yeah no .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 17 reviews over a long time span with repeated negative patterns across formats.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 57
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1207 reviews
MATH1185 reviews
STATS2002 reviews
MATH1111 review
MATH131 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH1901 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Not_Sure_Yet 1